Did You Think Emily Ratajkowski Was Rich Enough To Afford Clothes? This …

 Swimsuit 2014: St. Lucia/Bodypaint
Emily Ratajkowski – 12/02 – 12/05
St. Lucia/St. Lucia
12/2/2013
X157277 TK2
Credit: Walter Iooss Jr.
  

 WhatsApp

“};jQuery(document).ready(function(){dc_word_up_main();});

First, Emily Ratajkowski was the star of Robin Thicke’s “Blurred Lines” video, when she got nearly naked. Then she stripped down in the sand for that GQ cover. The 23-year-old played Ben Affleck’s mistress, and potential wife murderer, in “Gone Girl.” And she has been in Sports Illustrated Swim once or twice.

So yes, her resume is stacked.

But did you think Emily Ratajkowski was rich enough to afford clothes?

Because these photos of her wearing nothing but Yamamay lingerie, which the brand put on Instagram Monday, should be proof that clearly she can’t.

(Photo: Instagram)

(Photo: Instagram)

(Photo: Instagram)

Poor thing. (RELATED: Why Is It Called A Swimsuit Edition If Emily Ratajkowski Isn’t Wearing Anything? [PHOTOS])

Share and Enjoy