Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Should Rex Tillerson really leave?

December 16, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

Rumors originating in the White House that Secretary of State Rex TillersonRex Wayne TillersonOvernight Defense: Trump recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital | Mattis, Tillerson reportedly opposed move | Pentagon admits 2,000 US troops are in Syria | Trump calls on Saudis to ‘immediately’ lift Yemen blockade Trump has yet to name ambassadors to key nations in Mideast Mattis, Tillerson warned Trump of security concerns in Israel embassy move MORE has lost the confidence of President TrumpDonald John TrumpHouse Democrat slams Donald Trump Jr. for ‘serious case of amnesia’ after testimony Skier Lindsey Vonn: I don’t want to represent Trump at Olympics Poll: 4 in 10 Republicans think senior Trump advisers had improper dealings with Russia MORE and will soon be replaced have been complemented by several former senior State Department officials including Democrats, Republicans and (theoretically) career nonpartisans including a former secretary of State, that, in effect, Tillerson “must go.”

Among his critics outside the White House, the reasons for discontent are several and varied but center around two themes: First, that he is willing to be a mere figurehead in an administration in which an impulsive, vindictive president will make his own foreign policy decisions while deriding and diminishing his secretary of State, and second, that Tillerson has created his own mess by failing to manage the department, fill critical vacancies, push back against funding decreases, and that he capitulates on policy issues, even if he has done all of it at the direction of the White House. Any stronger, self-respecting senior cabinet official, let alone the secretary of State, would call the bluff or resign, they argue.

But is that really the course which those calling for his resignation should be pursuing, given their own policy preferences and recommendations? Even taking their criticisms as gospel, would Tillerson’s resignation be better or worse than his remaining, especially when his apparent successor would seem to be Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoTillerson: State Dept. ‘not missing a beat’ despite vacancies Trump considering spy network to combat ‘deep state’ enemies: Intercept Five things senators should ask Tom Cotton if he’s nominated to lead the CIA MORE, director of the Central Intelligence Agency?

A potential Tillerson resignation should be considered against his record and against the alternatives to his continued tenure. No one is suggesting that Tillerson is a runner-up against George Marshall, James Baker or Henry Kissinger, but that is not the realistic standard, especially given the president he serves. Together with Secretary of Defense James MattisJames Norman MattisOvernight Defense: Trump recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital | Mattis, Tillerson reportedly opposed move | Pentagon admits 2,000 US troops are in Syria | Trump calls on Saudis to ‘immediately’ lift Yemen blockade Trump has yet to name ambassadors to key nations in Mideast Mattis, Tillerson warned Trump of security concerns in Israel embassy move MORE and, for the most part, White House chief of staff John KellyJohn Francis KellyMORE, Tillerson has tempered Trump’s most impetuous instincts and comments on North Korea, NATO guarantees, the split among the Gulf states, the Saudi-led coalition‘s actions in Yemen, Pakistan, China and, until recently, Jerusalem.

To take only the most precarious potentials, notwithstanding Trump’s pointed and demeaning criticism that Tillerson is wasting his time talking with North Korea’s “Little Rocket Man” over the testing and potentially arming of missiles that can deliver nuclear strikes against our close allies and now even against U.S. territory, Tillerson has stayed the diplomatic course and arguably helped inhibit a preemptive first strike by the United States. He has sought to allay alarm in Europe about the U.S. commitments to NATO, especially Article 5, and the core of the alliance. He has walked back Trump’s urge to support the Saudi’s over the Qataris, encouraged discussion between them, helped avoid a complete rupture, and kept intact U.S. equities among them.

Pompeo, however, would almost certainly side with Trump on most such issues. He is more likely to commend, even celebrate, than temper Trump’s personal proclivities because he shares them. Had he been in Tillerson’s place, would there be any attempt to talk with North Korea? Or to work with Japan and South Korea on a common approach? Or to keep the Gulf allies from fratricide? Or to reverse Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s resignation and keep Lebanon from imploding? Or to avoid an even greater decline in personnel and budget at the State Department?

The option on offer in a Trump administration is not John Jay, George Schultz or Colin Powell. It is not the policies most of Trump’s critics support. Pompeo might well be more effective at staffing senior positions at the State Department, but consider who the incumbents would be and what policies would they would advance? Whatever Tillerson’s policy and managerial deficiencies, his critics should consider his likely replacement and, in that context and from their own perspectives, urge him to stay, hope that he does, and lend him appropriate support.

Gerald F. Hyman is a nonresident senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He served with the U.S. Agency for International Development for 17 years and was director of its Office of Democracy and Governance from 2002 to 2007.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

‘Dumbest story ever’: How Omarosa’s reality-star exit from the White House hijacked the news.

December 16, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

As the spooling drama of Omarosa Manigault Newman’s White House departure spun into its 36th hour, Washington began asking itself: “Does it actually matter whether Omarosa quit or was fired?”

“Dumbest story ever,” tweeted John Harwood, the CNBC reporter.

His message was liked more than 17,000 times, but still the saga of her dramatic exit Tuesday night from the Trump administration churned on through Thursday — a reality television show that just couldn’t find its way to the closing credits.

“Omarosa” continued trending on social media. The name crawled across cable news chyrons and resurfaced at the White House daily press briefing. It more than held its own in a pair of news cycles already plenty busy with the Alabama Senate race upset, the troubled tax reform plan and the massive Disney-Fox deal.

Omarosa. Omarosa. Omarosa.

All the players in the meta-soap opera surrounding the former reality TV star’s departure from the relatively inconsequential job of director of communications at the White House Office of Public Liaison kept the story going. Anonymous White House officials shared details of her exit with political reporters. Manigault Newman gave an exclusive morning show interview. White House correspondents kept trying to get to the bottom of the story.

“Why are the taxpayers continuing the pay her salary for another month if she resigned?” CNN’s Jeff Zeleny asked press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders at the White House press briefing.

“The president likes Omarosa,” Sanders said. She confirmed again that Manigault Newman had resigned but would be paid until Jan. 20 because “there’s a lot of different protocols that take place in the government.”

Other White House sources were quoted in gossipy stories detailing how Manigault Newman had “tripped the alarm” while trying to barge into the White House residence to take up her case with President Trump before she was escorted out. The New York Post ran an illustration on its cover of Manigault Newman being dragged from the executive mansion.

Manigault Newman disputed those stories in her interview with ABC’s “Good Morning America,” saying she left of her own volition but hinting that certain aspects of her 11-month stay made her “unhappy.”

“When I have my story to tell as the only African-American woman in this White House, as a senior staff and assistant to the president, I have seen things that have made me uncomfortable, that have upset me, that have affected me deeply and emotionally, that has affected my community and my people,” Manigault Newman said. “And when I can tell my story, it is a profound story that I know the world will want to hear.”

The political narrative on her time in the White House has already been written — and it doesn’t reflect well on her. Story after story described her wandering the halls of the White House aimlessly or ineffectively representing Trump before the groups she was hired to cultivate. Her appearance during a panel at the National Association of Black Journalists convention devolved into a screaming match, for instance.

She seemed cast in the same role in the White House that she had on “The Apprentice,” where she was the show’s elegant and icy villain competing for Trump’s favor against 15 other contestants. “I’m not here to make friends,” she said then, and butted heads with almost everyone else on the show.

Manigault Newman has long disputed her depiction as an anti-hero.

“What you see on the show is a gross misrepresentation of who I am,” she told The Washington Post in 2004. “This show is about ratings,” she noted, and she was pitted against the other female contestants because it was “dramatic.”

Still, at different points during her White House tenure Manigault Newman has referred to herself as “the Honorable Omarosa Manigault” and “Lady Newman,” which prompted cackles in Washington. And she seemed to make few friends during her time in the West Wing. On Thursday, she complained of White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly’s “militaristic style.”

She returned to the airwaves for a “Nightline” interview that aired in the wee hours Friday morning on ABC to defend her former boss, saying Trump “is not a racist” despite his repeated conflicts with people of color.

“Yes, I will acknowledge many of the exchanges, particularly in the last six months, have been racially charged,” Manigault Newman said. “Do we then just stop and label him as a racist? No.”

As the story of her exit wore on, annoyance grew in many corners. The usually upbeat GMA co-host Robin Roberts looked exasperated to even have to discuss the matter. “She said she has a story to tell and I’m sure she’ll be selling. . . . Bye, Felicia,” said Roberts, using a catchphrase from the movie “Friday” to summarily dismiss Manigault Newman.

Roland Martin, the host of a morning news show on TV One, arrived in the studio to tape his show Thursday morning and learned his producers had reserved a segment to assess her resignation. Martin cut it down to three minutes and began the conversation by saying three times: “I don’t give a damn.”

“Here we were the day after black women in particular were on the ground in Alabama helping to raise money and get out the vote to defeat Roy Moore [and] I simply was not going to debase myself by having a back and forth over what happened to Omarosa,” Martin said later. “I was choosing to bask in the glory of what black folks did in Alabama.”

But Manigault Newman’s friend Monique Pressley called the entire episode “a shame.” Pressley, who was a bridesmaid in Omarosa’s wedding and her friend of 20 years, sees racism and sexism in both the gawking fascination and backlash that has greeted the story.

“We see the highest-ranking African American female in our current administration being disrespected, dehumanized and minimized — not just by people at large, but by first and foremost other African Americans,” said Pressley, an attorney. “I wonder if it were Kellyanne Conway [who resigned]. . . if she would have gotten a ‘Later Becky’ the way Omarosa received a ‘Bye Felicia,’ or do we just reserve these guttural colloquialisms for people who look like us?”

Missing in the conversation, said Pressley, is a larger concern about representation in the Trump administration.

“Now, I look at a table of 30 senior staffers and there are no people of color,” she said. “She was in the room, [but] now what? She’s someone who has served in the National Guard, has been a professor; she’s someone who has multiple degrees, a member of the clergy. I just refuse to see her as some ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ person. . . . I don’t have a doubt that she’ll be fine.”

Omarosa might agree. “The White House is not my ceiling,” she told “Nightline’s” Deborah Roberts. “It’s just the beginning.”

Updated at 9:30 a.m.

Paul Farhi contributed to this report.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS