Wednesday, July 1, 2026

The 10 Events You Need To Know To Understand The Michael Flynn Story

December 5, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn arrives for his plea hearing at the Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, D.C. Special counsel Robert Mueller charged Flynn with one count of making a false statement to the FBI.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn arrives for his plea hearing at the Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, D.C. Special counsel Robert Mueller charged Flynn with one count of making a false statement to the FBI.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

If the saga of Michael Flynn feels like it’s been hanging over President Trump’s head since inauguration day, that’s because it has.

The story of how Trump’s first national security adviser came to plead guilty to lying to FBI investigators and cooperate in the special counsel’s Russia investigation spans two presidential terms and also touches government officials who were subsequently fired by Trump.

The Russia Investigations: After Flynn Plea Deal, Where Does Mueller Aim Next?

Here are 10 key events that explain why Flynn was legally vulnerable in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe and why his plea deal addresses one of the central questions in the wider Russia imbroglio.

1. President Obama sanctions Russia

On Dec. 28, 2016, then-President Obama ejects 35 Russian diplomats from the United States and introduces new sanctions against a number of Russian security services and individuals.

The move is retribution for Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, detailed in the unclassified summary of a highly classified report by the intelligence community early in the new year.

2. Flynn confers with transition officials and talks sanctions with Russia

On Dec. 29, Flynn speaks with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, as well as a “senior official” of the presidential transition team, according to court documents in Flynn’s case.

The documents describe how Flynn spoke his colleague in the administration-in-waiting — identified by some outlets as former deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland — about what to tell the Russian ambassador about the sanctions. Then he spoke with Kislyak on the phone.

“Flynn called the Russian ambassador and requested that Russia not escalate the situation and only respond to the U.S. sanctions in a reciprocal manner,” say the court documents. The Trump camp wants to offer Moscow the prospect for a better relationship once Trump is inaugurated.

On Dec. 31, Kislyak calls Flynn back and says Russia indeed will not escalate, as he asked. Russian President Vladimir Putin confirms that with a public announcement, which Trump hails on Twitter.

3. Pence denies Flynn talked sanctions

After a Washington Post report alludes to Flynn’s conversation, the administration-in-waiting begins denying they discussed sanctions. Not only is there suspicion about the issue itself, the question is raised about whether Flynn might have violated an obscure law that forbids Americans out of government from negotiating on behalf of the United States.

Logan Act Lingers For Others In Russia Probe, As All Eyes Look Up The Trump Ladder

So on Jan. 15, then-Vice President-elect Mike Pence makes a case to CBS’ Face the Nation.

“What I can confirm, having spoken to him about it, is that those conversations that happened to occur around the time that the United States took action to expel diplomats had nothing whatsoever to do with those sanctions,” Pence said.

But the FBI, which was monitoring Kislyak’s communications, knew that wasn’t so.

4. FBI investigators interview Flynn

On Jan. 24, Flynn gives a voluntary interview to FBI investigators looking at Russian interference.

In this interview, according to the charging documents, Flynn makes false statements about whether he asked Kislyak to refrain from “escalating the situation.” He also says that he doesn’t remember the follow-up conversation in which Kislyak confirms Russia’s decision regarding a sanctions escalation.

Mueller’s team also now says Flynn made false statements in the interview about calls he made regarding a United Nations Security Council resolution.

5. Sally Yates warns the White House about Flynn

On Jan. 26, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates meets with White House counsel Don McGahn to warn him the Justice Department had evidence, via the FBI surveillance, that what Pence was saying publicly was inaccurate.

“We told him we felt like the vice president and others were entitled to know that the information that they were conveying to the American people wasn’t true,” Yates said in testimony to a Senate Judiciary panel in May.

She adds that because Russian diplomatic and intelligence officials also knew about the content of the conversations — and probably had their own proof of them — Flynn was vulnerable to blackmail.

Learn More About The Trump-Russia Imbroglio

“We believed that Gen. Flynn was compromised with respect to the Russians,” she said. “To state the obvious, you don’t want your national security adviser compromised by the Russians.”

Yates and McGahn meet again the next day, Jan. 27, and they begin discussing ways that White House officials might review the evidence the FBI has about Flynn.

But Yates is fired by Trump three days later, after announcing she would not defend his travel restrictions on refugees and visa holders from seven majority-Muslim countries.

The White House also says McGahn told Trump about Yates’ warning that Flynn had lied to Pence, and likely given the same account to the FBI.

6. Trump asks Comey for “loyalty”

On Jan. 27, President Trump arranges a dinner with then-FBI director James Comey, where, according to Comey’s testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the president says: “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.”

It was uncomfortable, Comey said.

“I didn’t move, speak, or change my facial expression in any way during the awkward silence that followed,” Comey said. “We simply looked at each other in silence. The conversation then moved on, but he returned to the subject near the end of our dinner.”

Comey said he felt like the dinner was an effort on the part of the president to have him ask for his job and “create some sort of patronage relationship.”

The James Comey Saga, In Timeline Form

7. Flynn is fired …

On Feb. 13, Trump fires Flynn, after leaks reveal that Flynn did in fact talk about sanctions with the Russian ambassador. Flynn continues to deny the accusations, as close as four days before he is fired.

8. … and Trump wonders aloud if Comey can let Flynn go

On Feb. 14, Comey comes to the Oval Office for a counterterrorism meeting, and Trump asks him to stick around afterward for a one-on-one meeting.

“When the door by the grandfather clock closed, and we were alone, the president began by saying, ‘I want to talk about Mike Flynn,’ ” Comey testified in June. “He then said, ‘I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.’ “

Comey agrees Flynn is a “good guy,” but says he would not agree to let it go.

9. Trump fires Comey

On May 9, Trump fires Comey, saying in an interview two days later that the FBI director was a “showboat” and a “grandstander.”

Trump also mentions the FBI’s Russia investigation, which Comey was leading — “this Russia thing,” as Trump calls it.

Discussion in Washington broadens from the question of potential collusion between the Trump camp and the Russian attack on the election to the question of obstruction of justice. Did the president try to get rid of the FBI director to keep him from finding out something Trump wanted to keep hidden? Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein responds by appointing former FBI Director Robert Mueller to serve as a special counsel in the case.

Is Trump Guilty Of Obstruction Of Justice? Comey Laid Out The Case

10. Flynn pleads guilty, agrees to cooperate

On Nov. 30, Flynn signs a plea agreement with Mueller in which he acknowledges lying to the FBI about his sanctions conversation. On Dec. 1, Flynn appears in court and his deal becomes public.

The deal delivers to Mueller a witness who spent nearly all the 2016 campaign and the presidential transition at Trump’s elbow, one who was involved with many conversations with foreigners, including key Russians. Flynn’s cooperation resets the clock on the Russia imbroglio as he begins debriefing Mueller and his team.

As White House Makes Nice With Mueller, GOP Allies Sharpen Knives For Special Counsel

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Kushner says Mideast peace is essential to thwarting Iran and Islamist extremism

December 4, 2017 by  
Filed under Latest Lingerie News

Comments Off

President Trump’s push for a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians stems from a belief that his broader goals of stopping Iranian aggression and Islamist extremism will not be possible without it, presidential adviser Jared Kushner said in a rare public appearance Sunday.

“If we’re going to try to create more stability in the region as a whole, you have to solve this issue,” Kushner told Middle East experts gathered at the Brookings Institution’s Saban Forum. Trump, he said, “sees this as something that has to be solved.”

But nearly a year after Trump named Kushner, his son-in-law and senior White House aide, as point person for what he called “the ultimate deal,” there has been no public indication of where the initiative is heading.

Presumed participants in the plan — described by officials as a comprehensive package including Israel, the Palestinians, Arab governments and international backers — have been kept similarly in the dark, leading to widespread speculation and anxiety.

“If two states are in there, a major part of the [Israeli] coalition will object,” a senior Israeli official said last week. Any attempt to establish a Palestinian state in any form, the official said, “could bring down the government” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“There are just rumors, but we hear there are moves to bring the Arabs on board and provide Israel with rewards and give the Palestinians pressure and threats and extortion,” said Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the executive committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Reports that Trump plans this week to declare U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as the undisputed capital of Israel have elevated anxiety to panic in some quarters.

“This move will promote international anarchy and disrespect for global institutions and law,” PLO Secretary General Saeb Erekat said in a statement Sunday. The Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as their capital. By taking sides on an issue long considered part of “final status” negotiations, he said, the United States “will also be disqualifying itself to play any role in an initiative towards achieving a just and lasting peace.”

Jordan’s King Abdullah II, whom Kushner’s team considers a key regional partner, warned last week that a U.S. decision to move the embassy in Israel to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv “must come within a comprehensive solution that leads to the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, living side by side with Israel.”

Any move at this point, said Abdullah, who was in Washington to consult with Congress, “could be potentially exploited by terrorists to stoke anger, frustration and desperation in order to spread their ideologies.”

Monday is a deadline for Trump to either announce the embassy move — as required by 1995 legislation — or issue the same six-month waiver that he signed in the summer, as has every president before him over the past two decades. Administration officials have indicated that Trump will again sign the waiver, but he will make a midweek speech recognizing Jerusalem as the Israeli capital.

Kushner declined to comment on the embassy issue, saying that Trump was “still looking at a lot of different facts.”

“The president is going to make his decision. . . . He’ll be one who will want to tell you, not me,” he said. Haim Saban, the Israeli American media billionaire who heads the forum, an annual dialogue between U.S. and Israeli leaders, said he would call Kushner for the answer on Thursday — the day after Trump is expected to speak on the issue. “Perfect,” Kushner replied.

Kushner has stayed away from public view in recent months, as special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has investigated ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. The format of Kushner’s Sunday appearance was an on-stage interview with Saban, a major donor to the Democratic Party, who said the two had established a relationship in discussions about the Middle East. But Saban made little headway in excavating details of the peace plan.

After Kushner explained that the Iranians, with “their nuclear ambitions and their expansive regional mischief,” along with the threat from the Islamic State and extremist ideology could best be addressed after the distraction of the Israeli-Palestinian issue was resolved, Saban responded with the question many experts on the region have posed.

“I understand that. But to achieve that,” Saban said, “the team has in it an entrepreneurial real estate lawyer, a bankruptcy lawyer — I don’t know how you’ve lasted eight months in this lineup. . . . It’s impressive that it’s still going. There’s not a Mideast ­‘macher’ in this group.” Macher is a Yiddish word for a mover and shaker.

“How do you operate with, with all due respect, a bunch of Orthodox Jews who have no idea about anything?” he asked. “What are you guys doing? Seriously, I don’t understand this.”

Amid audience laughter, Kushner responded: “I’ll definitely say it’s not a conventional team. . . . It’s a perfectly qualified team. How is that?”

Three members of Kushner’s team, including him, are Orthodox Jews. Jason Greenblatt, the White House special representative for international negotiations, came to the administration after serving as executive vice president and chief legal officer of the Trump Organization. David Friedman, Trump’s bankruptcy lawyer and, like Kushner, a financial contributor to the Israeli settlement movement in the past, is the administration’s ambassador to Israel.

The fourth team member is Dina Powell, deputy national security adviser and an Egyptian American who is a Coptic Christian. The State Department, which led decades of failed Mideast peace efforts under previous administrations, has been kept largely out of the Trump initiative.

According to administration officials willing to discuss the process but not the contents of the peace package, the plan is to release a comprehensive, final document covering all aspects of a deal. Rather than previous attempts to move from one issue to another in search of compromises between Israel and the Palestinians, the hope is that each party will find enough it likes in the overall document that it will be more amenable to those aspects it might previously have rejected.

One administration analogy for both the process and its final presentation is to a dinner party in which the host, rather than asking guests what each would like to eat when they sit down at the table, has already prepared a several course, take-it-or-leave-it meal.

To reach a bottom line, Kushner and his team have met repeatedly with leaders and negotiators in countries throughout the region. “We’ve tried very hard to do a lot of listening,” he said, to “learn what their red lines are . . . to find areas of mutual agreement, to find reasons to do things rather than not do things.”

He brushed off publicly expressed Israeli and Palestinian concerns, and insistence that there is no wiggle room on what he acknowledged were the “elephants” among the issues that have dogged previous efforts, including establishment of a Palestinian state and its borders, Israeli settlements, and Jerusalem.

“We’ve solicited a lot of ideas from a lot of places,” Kushner said. “There is obviously a lot of speculation. . . . ‘There is a plan, what is it? Are these four points in or out?’

“We all kind of laugh and say, okay, we’re just not going to play the guessing game. . . . We know what’s in the plan. The Palestinians know what discussions we’ve had with them, the Israelis know.”

None of the parties have been told what the others have discussed, according to administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity about the undertaking that, as Kushner noted, has had “no leaks.”

Underlying all of Kushner’s calculations are what he called the “regional dynamics,” which the administration believes have brought the Saudis and other countries influential with the Palestinians to find common cause with Israel — and the administration — against Iran and extremism. The region, he said, is “unifying against Iran’s aggression.”

Officials insisted that while Arab partners — including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates — have a role to play, the main focus of the plan is on Israel and the Palestinians.

But Kushner sidestepped questions about the administration’s especially close ties with Saudi Arabia, and his own tight relationship with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, widely known as MBS.

Some experts attribute what appears to be a delay in release of the administration’s plan, initially believed set for the end of this year, to overreaching by MBS, who in recent weeks has arrested more than 200 members of the Saudi royal family and leading business persons, stepped into domestic politics in Lebanon and has been held responsible internationally for a humanitarian disaster in Yemen.

Kushner insisted that there was no delay, because there had never been a deadline.

“We’re businesspeople, we’re not politicians,” he said. “We’ve been very deliberate about not setting time frames. We’re not trying to do this the way it’s been done before.”

Morris reported from Jerusalem.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS