You are here:
Home / Archives for admin
(Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images)
Twitter removed the blue “verification” check marks from a handful of prominent white nationalists and far-right conservatives and issued new guidelines after the uproar that followed its decision earlier this month to verify the organizer of the Charlottesville rally.
The check marks are a visual cue that the company gives to prominent accounts to help readers ensure they are authentic.
Jason Kessler, the organizer of the August Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville that drew various factions of the far right — white nationalists and supremacists, armed militias and a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan — before devolving into violence that left one counterprotester dead, was among those who said the blue check mark was taken away from his account Wednesday. Others who said they lost their verified status included the white nationalist Richard Spencer, far-right activists Laura Loomer and James Allsup, and Tommy Robinson, the host of a show on the fringe conservative site Rebel TV. Tim Gionet, an alt-right figurehead who went by the name Baked Alaska, was suspended from the service.
[‘Like Bond villains’: What happened when Steven Mnuchin and his wife posed with a sheet of money]
The move marks the latest skirmish in a debate over speech that has exploded over the past couple of years in online forums such as Twitter and those in the real world, like college campuses and city squares, as extremist figures with racially motivated views have increasingly moved into public view. And it comes as the publicly traded company faces increased pressure to weed out the hateful speech, images and threats that have blossomed on the service in recent years.
Those who had their authentication removed quickly complained — on Twitter, as they are still free to tweet and use the service regularly — that the move was an act of censorship.
“Being pro free speech isn’t selective,” Loomer wrote. “It means you support everyone’s speech, even if you don’t like them.”
In a phone interview, Spencer said he was worried the move would lead to people like him being banned from Twitter.
“And it is a kind of ‘depersoning’ of someone,” he said, of being unverified.
The social media site said it was in the process of eliminating the verification status of accounts that do not adhere to a new set of guidelines it issued Wednesday. These include accounts that use misleading names or identities on Twitter, promote hate or violence against other people based on race, nationality, sexual orientation, religion and gender (or support organizations and individuals that promote these messages), harass others, threaten violence or distribute gruesome imagery.
Verification helps promote the accounts, lending them a sort of semiofficial imprimatur from the company. But Twitter said that they were never meant to be an endorsement.
“We gave verified accounts visual prominence on the service which deepened this perception,” it wrote. “We should have addressed this earlier but did not prioritize the work as we should have.”
As a private company, Twitter has no legal free-speech obligations to those who use its service. It noted in its new guidelines that it “reserves the right to remove verification at any time without notice.”
[‘Who are they gonna believe, you or me?’: Texas prosecutor fired after drunken Uber tirade]
The decision comes about a week after an uproar set off when Twitter gave a verification badge to Kessler.
“Looks like I FINALLY got verified by Twitter,” he tweeted last week. “I must be the only working class white advocate with that distinction.”
Twitter suspended its verification process after the outcry and said Wednesday it was continuing to draft a new policy.
The company’s public image also has suffered with the recent disclosure that Russian operatives used hundreds of fake accounts on the service — some with significant levels of influence and tens of thousands of followers — as part of what officials have described as a campaign to sow division in the United States before the 2016 election by gaming the social media platforms, their users and their algorithms.
Kessler had previously used Twitter to call Heather Heyer, who was killed at the Charlottesville rally by a man described as a Nazi sympathizer, a “fat, disgusting Communist,” whose death “was payback time,” and he was arrested last month after he allegedly shared the home address of an anti-racist activist online.
Twitter’s decision in 2016 to ban Milo Yiannopoulos, a right-wing writer and speaker who once led a karaoke rendition of “America the Beautiful” in front of a crowd of people doing Nazi salutes, drew the ire of some conservatives at the time.
Critics on the left have long contended that Twitter’s lenience with extremist accounts gives them the prominence and platform to help spread their messages.
Jack Dorsey, the company’s chief executive, said last week that Twitter realized it needed to overhaul the verification process “some time ago.”
Justin Wm. Moyer contributed to this report.
Read more:
Two more women describe unwanted overtures by Roy Moore at Alabama mall
‘Like Bond villains:’ What happened when Steven Mnuchin and his wife posed with a sheet of money
Kayla Moore emerges as her husband’s fiercest and most vocal defender
Share and Enjoy
Six House Democrats on Wednesday launched the latest official effort to oust President Trump, introducing five new articles of impeachment revolving around the central theme that the president is a danger to the country.
“Given the magnitude of the constitutional crisis, there’s no reason for delay,” said Rep. Steve CohenStephen (Steve) Ira CohenImpeachment calls grow louder Dems to file new impeachment articles against Trump Democrats up calls for Congress to protect Mueller MORE (D-Tenn.), the sponsor of the resolution.
Joining Cohen in endorsing the articles are Democratic Reps. Luis Gutiérrez (Ill.), Al GreenAlexander (Al) N. GreenImpeachment calls grow louder Pelosi called Dem mega-donor’s ‘Impeach Trump’ campaign a ‘distraction’: report Dems to file new impeachment articles against Trump MORE (Texas), Marcia FudgeMarcia Louise FudgeLawmakers push regulators on how Amazon’s Whole Foods deal could affect ‘food deserts’ Dems announce ‘unity commission’ members If Democrats want to take back the White House start now MORE (Ohio), John YarmuthJohn YarmuthTax reform sprint leaves little time for funding fight Democrats split over priorities for end-of-year battle House adopts Senate budget, takes step toward tax reform MORE (Ky.) and Adriano EspaillatAdriano de Jesus Espaillat CabralWe will fight for our DREAMers Influential Latino Dems clash in NY district Rangel challenger concedes MORE (N.Y.).
The lawmakers pointed to numerous actions by Trump they say make him unfit to be president, but they singled out five actions they say rise to a level meriting impeachment.
Among those, the lawmakers say Trump obstructed justice when he fired former FBI Director James Comey, who was leading the federal investigation into Moscow’s 2016 election meddling — a probe that has included questions of potential collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign team.
They’re also accusing Trump of violating the foreign emoluments clause, which bars public officials from receiving gifts from foreign governments without Congress’s consent, and the domestic emoluments clause, which bars the president from profiting from his office.
Finally, the Democrats say the president has undermined two of the country’s central institutions — the courts and the press — in ways that threaten the health of the nation’s democracy.
The impeachment clause, Green said, “was drafted for a time such as this and a president such as this.”
Green had introduced impeachment articles of his own last month, largely focused on accusations that Trump has sown racial and ethnic divisions throughout the country.
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) has also launched an impeachment effort based on the Comey firing. He did not join Cohen’s effort Wednesday, though Cohen said there are others who will sign on “immediately or soon thereafter.” He did not name those lawmakers.
The Republican National Committee (RNC) called the Democrats’ move Wednesday a “baseless radical effort” and vowed that it won’t distract from the president’s agenda.
“House Democrats lack a positive message and are completely unwilling to work across the aisle, so instead they’ve decided to support a baseless radical effort that the vast majority of Americans disagree with,” said RNC spokesman Michael Ahrens.
“Republicans are focused on issues the middle class actually cares about, like cutting taxes and growing the economy,” he added.
Championed by a small number of vocal and liberal Democrats, the impeachment push has caused a good deal of discord within the Democratic Caucus.
House Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D’Alesandro PelosiPelosi rails against ‘scam’ GOP tax-reform plans Playing politics with America’s money is a dangerous game Pelosi: This is the week Trump ‘went rogue’ MORE (D-Calif.) and Rep. Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerLawmakers question military’s lapse after Texas shooting Texas shooting brings familiar response on Capitol Hill Impeachment calls grow louder MORE (D-Md.), the minority whip, have both been public voices opposing impeachment, framing the effort as premature amid the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russia’s election interference.
“Do we disagree with the policies? We do. But disagreeing with the policies is not enough to overturn an election, a free and fair election,” Hoyer told reporters in the Capitol shortly after Cohen’s news conference.
“There are a large number of Democrats that believe this president ought to be impeached, we have just a made a judgment that the facts aren’t there to pursue that,” he said.
There are also political reasons for the leadership’s efforts to mute the impeachment drum. The Democrats had centered their 2016 campaign largely around attacks on Trump — a strategy that backfired — and the party brass doesn’t want to repeat the same mistake heading into the 2018 midterm elections.
Cohen acknowledged that a number of Democrats simply “want Trump to hang himself, and think that we don’t need to help him.”
“But I think there are a great number of Democrats who think there have been impeachable offenses,” he said. “I think the majority of Democrats think that.”
Cohen said he called Pelosi immediately after Trump’s response to the white supremacist marches in Charlottesville, Va., in August to relay his intention to push for impeachment. He acknowledged that party leaders weren’t thrilled with the idea.
“It would be a stretch to say they were on board,” Cohen said.
Still, Cohen, who is Jewish, said the attacks on black people and Jews in Charlottesville were, for him, a bridge too far.
“I said, ‘I can’t do this anymore.’ And [Pelosi] understands that,” he said.
The impeachment proponents have been encouraged by liberal activists urging Capitol Hill Democrats to get more aggressive in their efforts to topple Trump.
Tom Steyer, the billionaire environmentalist, is spending millions of dollars on national TV ads pressing Democratic leaders to get on board. The Democrats introducing the new impeachment articles on Wednesday seem to have taken notice.
“This is not a call in a vacuum,” said Espaillat. “There is a real sentiment in the nation for this to begin.”
Cohen said he’s not seeking a vote on his resolution, but only urging hearings from the Judiciary Committee.
With Republicans controlling the chamber, those entreaties will surely go ignored, but Cohen said that won’t stop the Democrats from staging expert-based forums on the issue — with or without the Republicans.
“It’s important that we not let the failure of the Republicans stop us from doing what is right,” Cohen said.
Jonathan Easley contributed to this report, which was updated at 12:12 p.m.
Share and Enjoy
