Puerto Rico Cancels Whitefish Energy Contract to Rebuild Power Lines
October 30, 2017 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
Comments Off
Mr. Rosselló said he had asked for a federal investigation of the contract award process, and for the power authority to appoint a trustee to review contract bidding. He stressed that no wrongdoing had been discovered, but he said that the contract had become a “distraction” and that attention had to be refocused on restoring service.
“I am making this determination because it is in the best interest of the people of Puerto Rico,” Mr. Rosselló said at a news conference.
The contract had been attracting intense scrutiny in Washington. The House Committee on Natural Resources, which oversees Puerto Rican affairs, sent a letter on Thursday to the power authority demanding all records connected to the contract. That same day, the inspector general’s office at the Department of Homeland Security said it was investigating. Mr. Rosselló also ordered an audit of the contract, and the board that Congress created to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial affairs asked a federal court to appoint a new manager to supervise the utility.
The chief executive of the power authority, Ricardo Ramos, defended the contract, which he awarded. But he said on Sunday that he understood the governor’s decision to cancel it because negative publicity and politics on the mainland had made the situation untenable.
Mr. Ramos said Whitefish had recently requested security protection because people had started throwing rocks and bottles at the company’s crews on the island, in the belief that the contract had been awarded corruptly.
“If you are in your house without power, and there’s a sense that the energy authority gave away $300 million to a company that had or did not have experience, the reaction is not positive, and we’re seeing that,” Mr. Ramos said.
Democrats on the mainland and opposition politicians in Puerto Rico questioned the deal and were alarmed to see that the company’s chief executive, Andy Techmanski, came from the same small town in Montana as Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. In an interview shortly after securing the contract, Mr. Techmanski told a local news station that he had been in touch with Mr. Zinke, whose son worked for Whitefish last summer, for “more resources.”
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Both the Department of the Interior and Mr. Techmanski denied any impropriety in connection with the contract.
When the mayor of San Juan, Carmen Yulín Cruz, raised questions about the contract, the company fired back on Twitter, suggesting that it could withdraw its crews from her city. The company later apologized.
In a statement on Friday, FEMA said it had not confirmed whether prices listed in the contract between Whitefish and the power authority were reasonable. Mr. Ramos said the prices were in line with what other companies had requested.
In an interview on Thursday, Mr. Ramos said he had not heard of Whitefish before September. “We checked them out on the internet,” he said. “There was a list of projects that they had done in the past, including with the Department of Energy. They showed a lot of experience in using helicopters to build transmission lines. On paper, they did have the experience necessary.”
Mr. Ramos had earlier said that Whitefish got the deal because it did not ask for a large payment up front. Other companies, wary of Prepa’s bankruptcy, had demanded hefty sums, he said. The power authority had also been in talks with another company, PowerSecure.
Mr. Ramos said on Sunday that the contract was being canceled because attention had shifted from managing a humanitarian crisis to “managing reputations.” “That’s risky,” he said. “I want to clarify that the cancellation of this contract does not mean there was anything outside the law, or out of the ordinary.”
He said the power authority had already paid Whitefish almost $10 million and would have to reimburse the company for the cost of moving helicopters, trucks and other equipment to Puerto Rico, and now for returning them to the United States. He said that work that was already in progress would be completed.
Mr. Ramos said he would send a letter to the electric company board asking for a resolution formally ending the contract, and that the board would meet Monday or Tuesday to address the matter. The cancellation would take effect 30 days after a resolution is adopted.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Whitefish said in a statement on Sunday that it was “very disappointed” at the cancellation. “The decision will only delay what the people of Puerto Rico want and deserve — to have the power restored quickly in the same manner their fellow citizens on the mainland experience after a natural disaster,” the statement said. “We will certainly finish any work that Prepa wants us to complete, and stand by our commitments, knowing that we made an important contribution to the restoration of the power grid since our arrival on the island on Oct. 2.”
The company said it had already finished work on two major transmission lines, significantly speeding up the restoration of power to the city of Manatí and to parts of San Juan.
In interviews this month, Mr. Techmanski said he had flown to Puerto Rico before the contract was signed with Prepa on a “leap of faith,” and that his company’s ability to mobilize quickly was vital to winning the contract.
Asked this month how such a small company could manage such a big job, Mr. Ramos of Prepa said, “Every company is small at some point in time.”
Criticism was also targeted at the Army Corps of Engineers, which was given responsibility by the Trump administration for restoring power in Puerto Rico and had no involvement in the Whitefish deal. Governor Rosselló said he was led to believe that the Corps would restore power throughout the island within 40 days, but that it has just seven engineering crews on the island.
“Everyone has their role here, and the Corps of Engineers, honestly, has not played its role,” Mr. Rosselló said. “The Corps contracted two companies, and those companies are in the process of subcontracting. This does not have the sense of urgency that it should have.”
Mr. Rosselló said the governors of New York and Florida had now agreed to send utility crews to Puerto Rico. Such mutual aid arrangements are common after emergencies, and are usually invoked immediately. But the power authority has said it did not seek that kind of aid after the hurricane because having the Army Corps of Engineers do the restoration work would have spared it from paying anything.
José E. Sánchez, the head of the Corps’s energy restoration task force, defended its work in a statement. “We understand the frustration by the governor of Puerto Rico, and realize the importance of restoring power as quickly as possible,” Mr. Sánchez said. “We continue to expedite the delivery of crews, material and equipment to the island in support of this urgent effort. We will not be satisfied until the people of Puerto Rico have safe and reliable power.”
Continue reading the main story
Share and Enjoy
Indictment expected from Mueller’s probe into Trump campaign aides
October 30, 2017 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
Comments Off
One of two former top strategists for the Trump campaign is “likely” to face indictment as early as Monday, a senior Democrat said Sunday, previewing what would be the first criminal charges in the intensifying probe led by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III into current and former members of President Trump’s inner orbit.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said a federal judge could unseal an indictment against either Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign manager, or Michael Flynn, who briefly served as Trump’s national security advisor in the White House.
Schiff’s comments came amid intense speculation at the White House and on Capitol Hill over media reports that a federal grand jury in Washington has approved its first indictment in the FBI investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and whether members of Trump’s campaign actively colluded with Moscow.
Schiff, a former federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, said he was reacting to press reports and could not confirm the target or whether it involved Russia. “We haven’t been told who it is,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.”
Representatives of Flynn and Manafort could not be reached for comment on Sunday, and some reports suggested other individuals might be the focus of the sealed indictment.
Trump did not specifically react to the expected indictment, but in an angry series of tweets, he denounced what he called “phony Trump/Russia… ‘collusion,’ which doesn’t exist.”
As in the past, he sought to blame partisan politics for the widening scandal, accusing rival Hillary Clinton and Democrats of orchestrating the FBI investigations, the grand jury probe and multiple congressional inquiries in an effort to undermine his administration.
“The Dems are using this terrible (and bad for our country) Witch Hunt for evil politics, but the R’s…are now fighting back like never before. There is so much GUILT by Democrats/Clinton, and now the facts are pouring out. DO SOMETHING!”
He added, “All of this ‘Russia’ talk right when the Republicans are making their big push for historic Tax Cuts Reform. Is this coincidental? NOT!”
Manafort, a political consultant, has long been active in Republican circles in Washington even as he developed major business deals in Russia and Ukraine. Manafort was paid tens of millions of dollars for his work on behalf of the former Russian-backed government in Ukraine.
He has been a target of an FBI counterintelligence investigation since at least 2014, two years before he joined Trump’s campaign, although he was never charged.
In 2014, federal authorities obtained a special warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to secretly eavesdrop on Manafort’s communications. The warrant was renewed in early 2016 before lapsing last October, according to lawyers familiar with the matter.
This summer, on July 26, a team of FBI agents armed with a “no knock” warrant raided Manafort’s residence in Alexandria, Va., to collect digital records and other evidence. In August, the New York Times reported that federal prosecutors had informed Manafort’s lawyers of their intention to secure his indictment.
Flynn, a retired Army three-star general and former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, served as a senior national security advisor to Trump during the campaign and spoke on his behalf at the Republican National Convention.
He was named national security advisor after Trump won the election but resigned after just 24 days following news reports of his telephone and personal contacts with Russia’s ambassador to Washington. Flynn subsequently amended personal-financial disclosure forms to report previously unacknowledged income from foreign clients.
The expected indictment — and whether it focuses on criminal activity during the 2016 presidential race or from business dealings prior to or separate from the campaign — dominated Sunday TV talk shows.
“It’s going to be really important whether or not this indictment involves 15-year-old business transactions or 15-day-old conversations with Russia,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, (R-S.C.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said on Fox News Sunday.
Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, decried the apparent leak of a sealed grand jury indictment, which he said was illegal. But he declined to impugn Mueller’s leadership of the investigation and said he saw no grounds for Mueller to resign.
“I readily concede I’m in an increasingly small group of Republicans,” Gowdy said. “I think Bob Mueller has a really distinguished career of service to our country.… I would encourage my Republican friends: Give the guy a chance to do his job.”
Sen. Susan Collins, (R-Maine), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, one of four congressional panels conducting investigations separate from Mueller’s criminal probe, was asked on CBS’s “Face the Nation’’ about any sign of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.
“I have not yet seen any definitive evidence of collusion,” Collins responded. “I have seen lots of evidence that the Russians were very active in trying to influence the election.”
U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that the Russian government purposefully sought to meddle in the U.S. election, notably through hacking of Democratic Party emails and targeted postings on social media sites, to discredit American democracy and to help Trump beat Clinton.
Trump has consistently denied any improper ties to Russia, and has said he is not a target of the FBI investigation.
david.willman@latimes.com