Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Bob Corker, Republican senator from Tennessee, announces his retirement

September 27, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) announced Tuesday that he will not seek reelection next year, another blow to the Republican establishment on the same day the latest GOP effort to revamp the Affordable Care Act failed.

Corker and other Republican leaders in Congress have come under fire from President Trump and his supporters for not delivering in the early days of the administration.

Once considered an ally of Trump’s national security team, Corker traded insults with the president during the August break amid chatter that staunch conservatives would mount a primary challenge to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman.

Corker’s retirement will touch off what is likely to be a highly contested, ideologically driven primary. It also creates a vacuum among Senate Republicans for leaders on national security issues. For now, Corker isn’t planning on getting involved in either contest.

“After much thought, consideration and family discussion over the past year, Elizabeth and I have decided that I will leave the United States Senate when my term expires at the end of 2018,” the Chattanooga Republican said in a statement.

Corker comes from Tennessee’s long tradition of establishment Republican figures who came to the Senate with ambitions that went beyond the state’s expansive borders. Two of the past five Senate GOP leaders have been from Tennessee, while Corker and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) are two of the most powerful committee chairmen.

Corker acknowledged that his clout led him to consider breaking his pledge, initially made during his 2006 race, to serve only two terms. “As we have gained influence, that decision has become more difficult. But I have always been drawn to the citizen legislator model,” he said in his statement.

But the establishment wing of the Republican Party has been under assault since the tea party movement took hold seven years ago, and even more so in the Trump era, when mild-mannered dealmakers have fallen out of favor with conservative voters who increasingly prefer angry confrontations over ideological outcomes.

Corker faced that dynamic back home over the August congressional break, when he questioned Trump’s stability after the president’s response to the violence in Charlottesville. “He has not demonstrated that he understands what has made this nation great,” he told local reporters.

That prompted taunting tweets from Trump, who said that Corker was “constantly asking me” whether to seek reelection.

Corker wrestled with the decision of whether to run for months, he said, finally coming to peace with the idea of retiring in late August, while at an event in Clarksville. He set a final deadline of Tuesday at noon to make his decision, he said, whatever happened with the health-care vote.

“I came as a citizen legislator, I did, and hopefully I provided some entertainment for you all by being a person who’s not thinking about reelection,” Corker said during an interview in his office. “That’s the way I came, and I want to depart on that same basis.”

Corker revealed his plans to retire just hours after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced that he would not hold a vote on the latest bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act because it was destined to fail amid defections from GOP moderates.

Corker’s announcement also came just hours before polls closed in the Republican primary runoff in Alabama, in which appointed Sen. Luther Strange lost to Roy Moore, a former state Supreme Court justice. Moore’s insurgent campaign emboldened the sort of anti-establishment figures who have made McConnell a target of enmity and who were searching for a primary challenge to Corker.

Corker almost retired in 2012, but he was coaxed into running again when it became clear that he would be the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee.

There is a growing fear among Senate Republicans that other incumbents will retire or face heated primary challenges next year.

Next year’s Tennessee Senate race will give hard-line conservatives their best chance yet to break through in a state where they have failed in recent primaries for Senate and governor — one of the last holdouts against the tea party wave that has swept other Southern states.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) might try to fill the conservative lane. Former representative Stephen Fincher (R), who retired last year with $2.4 million remaining in his campaign account, could try to run as a tea party hero — he was the first non-Democrat to win his western Tennessee seat since Davy Crockett — but with establishment help as someone who worked well with Alexander and Corker.

Some will look to Peyton Manning, the Super Bowl-winning quarterback who went to the University of Tennessee and retired in early 2016 from professional football. Manning is close to Corker, who brought him to a congressional GOP retreat this year.

Corker’s departure will be felt perhaps most acutely in the area of foreign relations, where the Tennessean not only served as his party’s top voice in the Senate but has for years been celebrated as one of the GOP’s best bipartisan dealmakers.

He established his chops early in his Senate career when lawmakers ratified the New START treaty, a strategic arms-control pact that regulates the size of the U.S. and Russian nuclear stockpiles. Corker was one of the key GOP players who negotiated changes that made it possible to bring more conservative votes on board.

As chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Corker also tackled nuclear security, joining with ranking Democrat Benjamin L. Cardin (Md.) to design a bill that gave Congress an opportunity to weigh in on a multilateral deal to rein in Iran’s nuclear ambitions before it could go into effect.

More recently, Corker has been the chief go-between for the White House and Congress when it comes to whether the president will certify Iran’s compliance with the deal next month — a decision that could kick off a brutal battle on Capitol Hill over whether to reimpose nuclear sanctions against Tehran.

Corker has fallen into the role of liaison between the Trump administration and the Senate on other matters as well, including sanctions, nuclear threats and foreign wars. He speaks with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson constantly and has frequent contact with the president.

At times, that has meant Corker has been the one holding the Senate back from tackling issues popular with the rank and file. For months, for example, he staved off a burgeoning effort to increase sanctions against Russia — he later explained that he intended to give Tillerson a chance to make a deal with Moscow to improve the bleak war in Syria.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Puerto Rico is still a victim of colonial neglect

September 27, 2017 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

Want smart analysis of the most important news in your inbox every weekday along with other global reads, interesting ideas and opinions to know? Sign up for the Today’s WorldView newsletter.

It took almost a week after Hurricane Maria slammed into Puerto Rico for the U.S. territory’s plight to take center stage in the American news cycle. That was partly due to President Trump, who used his Twitter account and public statements to wage a battle with the National Football League and its protesting athletes, rather than focusing national attention on the storm-battered island. When he did mention Puerto Rico over the weekend, he did so with a curious stream of tweets that appeared to blame Puerto Rico’s woes on internal dysfunctions and “massive debt” owed to Wall Street financiers.

Despite the Trump administration’s insistence that it is on top of the crisis, some 3.4 million Puerto Ricans — basically the entire population — remain without regular electricity. An estimated 1.5 million are without access to clean drinking water. It is a remarkable, shocking state of affairs for an island inhabited by more American citizens than 21 individual states on the U.S. mainland. Countless residents are cut off by collapsed physical infrastructure and the failure of communications systems on the island.

My colleague Samantha Schmidt reported from one corner of Puerto Rico, where residents despaired at the lack of outside aid. “In the five days since Maria battered the city of Morovis, 37 miles southwest of San Juan, residents and local officials said they had received no help from Puerto Rico officials and had no contact with federal agencies,” Schmidt wrote. “Puerto Ricans across the island have echoed those frustrations as advocates off the island began to put pressure on the Trump administration to speed up help to U.S. citizens who have long felt disconnected from the mainland but perhaps have never felt so alone.”

On Tuesday, Trump defended the pace of relief efforts with the simple excuse that Puerto Rico is “on an island in the middle of the ocean,” where “you can’t just drive your trucks there from other states.” But the deeper reality is that Puerto Rico is also stranded in a faraway place in the American imagination.

It just so happens that this year marked the 100th anniversary of Washington’s decision to confer U.S. citizenship on the inhabitants of Puerto Rico, an island wrestled away from Spain in an earlier war at a time when a burgeoning American empire ran roughshod across the Caribbean. Yet, even a century later and amid a barrage of news reports on the two consecutive hurricanes that battered Puerto Rico, the island still seems a distant relic of forgotten imperium for many Americans.

A new Morning Consult poll of 2,200 U.S. adults found that only 54 percent of Americans knew that people born in Puerto Rico were American citizens. Tellingly, the majority of those who were not aware of their compatriots’ status did not approve of sending aid to the island.

Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territory, meaning that while its residents are citizens, they send one nonvoting representative to Washington and have no say in presidential elections. For decades, political debates have raged over whether the island should maintain that status, push for statehood or seek independence.

A pronounced disaffection has set in, largely a result of a decade-long recession and a staggering public-debt crisis deepened, in part, by a Washington-appointed board that has imposed grinding austerity on the island. The shambolic economy has spurred a brain drain and increased migration to the mainland, which further undermines Puerto Rico’s chances for revitalization.

“The United States may not like to see itself as the type of nation that has colonies, but if you’re not treating Puerto Rico and its American citizens the same way as you treat states and theirs, that’s the only explanation,” wrote journalist and broadcaster Julio Ricardo Varela. “The island always struggles to get federal aid for natural disasters that flows virtually automatically to people on the mainland. Maria is the worst example, but it’s hardly the first.”

The storm has brought the island’s state of political neglect into sharp relief. “It is long-term structural problems that turn a disaster into a catastrophe,” wrote Yarimar Bonilla, an associate professor of anthropology and Caribbean studies at Rutgers University. “Vulnerability is not simply a product of natural conditions; it is a political state and a colonial condition.”

Bonilla added: “With a poverty rate nearly double that of Mississippi, failing infrastructure that has been neglected for more than a decade and a public sector that has been increasingly dismantled in response to the debt crisis, the island was already in a state of emergency long before the storm hit.”

A case in point: the island’s dams, which are threatening to fail in the aftermath of the storm. Water is already pouring out of the 90-year-old Guajataca Dam, which had not been inspected in four years by the bankrupt state-owned utility tasked with monitoring it.

“After one hundred years of citizenship, Puerto Ricans are prohibited from managing their own economy, negotiating their own trade relations, or setting their own consumer prices,” wrote Nelson Denis, author of “War Against All Puerto Ricans,” in an essay earlier this year. “Puerto Rico has been little more than a profit center for the United States: first as a naval coaling station, then as a sugar empire, a cheap labor supply, a tax haven, a captive market, and now as a municipal bond debtor and target for privatization. It is an island of beggars and billionaires: fought over by lawyers, bossed by absentee landlords, and clerked by politicians.”

That condition won’t likely change under Trump’s watch. The president’s “attitude toward Puerto Rico is just the latest example of how the United States views its island colony — good enough to be a place for U.S. companies to make money, but not good enough to have any real political power,” wrote Varela. “Any push for a bipartisan solution for comprehensive relief has no political value for anyone in Washington.”

And so, even as relief and aid reach the island, it won’t alleviate the fact that a far tougher reckoning still needs to take place.

Want smart analysis of the most important news in your inbox every weekday along with other global reads, interesting ideas and opinions to know? Sign up for the Today’s WorldView newsletter.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS