Friday, July 10, 2026

Epic Floods — Not Just In Texas — Are A Challenge For Aid Groups

August 30, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

A boy on the outskirts of Bogra, Bangladesh, on August 20.

Turjoy Chowdhury/NurPhoto via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Turjoy Chowdhury/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A boy on the outskirts of Bogra, Bangladesh, on August 20.

Turjoy Chowdhury/NurPhoto via Getty Images

With a reported 50 inches of rainfall, flash flooding and, high, murky waters, Hurricane Harvey in Houston has gripped America’s attention. But halfway around the world, another flood has also wreaked havoc on historic levels. Two weeks ago, record monsoon rains hit parts of Bangladesh, India and Nepal, bringing the worst floods the region has seen in years. Over 1,200 people have been killed and 24 million affected.

Relief agencies like the Red Cross, Islamic Relief and Save the Children are on the ground in both areas, juggling resources to address the crises. On its face, the humanitarian needs are the same, explains Jono Anzalone, vice president of international services at the American Red Cross, who just returned from Bangladesh, where he witnessed flood relief efforts. But for workers and volunteers in the South Asia and the U.S., the conditions to deliver aid couldn’t be any more different.

NPR interviewed Anzalone, Minhaj Hassan of Islamic Relief and Laura Cardinal, senior director of humanitarian response at Save the Children about the situation in both disaster areas. The interviews have been edited for length and clarity.

Editor’s note: In investigative stories by NPR, the Red Cross was criticized for “poorly managed projects, questionable spending and dubious claims of success” after the earthquake in Haiti and Superstorm Sandy. The Red Cross has defended its record. Addressing concerns about the Red Cross role in the wake of Hurricane Harvey, a spokesperson told NPR: “We respect donor intent and assure Americans that all donations raised for Hurricane Harvey relief efforts will enable the Red Cross to prepare for, respond to and help people recover from this specific disaster.”

A flooded street during heavy rain in Mumbai, India on August 29.

Imtiyaz Shaikh/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Imtiyaz Shaikh/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

A flooded street during heavy rain in Mumbai, India on August 29.

Imtiyaz Shaikh/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Interview Highlights

Is having two flood disasters putting a strain on relief efforts?

Anzalone: What is challenging is that this is just another disaster on top of four famines in Africa and the Middle East, a cholera crisis in Yemen, protracted emergencies in Syria, Afghanistan. Donor fatigue is a significant concern. When you have this many simultaneous disasters, it’s hard to draw attention to any particular one.

What do the floods in Houston and South Asia have in common?

Cardinal: Whether it’s here at home or across the ocean, children and families have been stranded in their homes. Many have lost everything. Education has been disrupted. Businesses have been closed, destroyed. It will take a long time for people to restart their lives. In Nepal, for example, 80 percent of the fields were destroyed, which has a huge impact on the agricultural sector and food security.

Are the needs similar?

Cardinal: Children and adults need safe places and access to food and water. Children need psychosocial support. We need to get children back in school as quickly as possible. In both places, the situation is still in the first phase: We are delivering life-saving support right in the middle of the emergency. In Nepal, the waters have started to recede, but there’s another forecast of rain.

And what’s different?

Anzalone: Infrastructure. If you compare the shelter conditions in Bangladesh to Texas, as dire as the condition may seem in Texas, typically, we would at least have safe structures on safe ground — not in flood plains.

What about health needs?

Anzalone: In Bangladesh, India and Nepal every single year, things like bed nets [to keep away mosquitoes that can spread malaria and dengue], oral rehydration salts [to prevent diarrheal disease and cholera] can save a person’s life. Those are priority items to distribute when a disaster like this strikes.

In the U.S., it’s uncommon to see the distribution of mosquito nets and rehydration salts. Even though in Texas we do have mosquitoes, we’re very fortunate that the shelters have well-contained vector control [methods to shut out mosquitoes and other disease-carrying animals].

What about recovery efforts? How will those differ?

Anzalone: For better or for worse, when people look at the U.S. response system, we have a very mature federal disaster response system, starting with FEMA [the Federal Emergency Management Agency]. It’s a machine. Immediately before landfall of Hurricane Harvey, the governor of Texas requested aid for long-term recovery projects.

You don’t see that in Nepal, Bangladesh or India. In Nepal and Bangladesh, the government simply doesn’t have the resources. There is no a tax base to support that robust response and recovery system. Their process to rebuild is complicated by underlying development issues that are inherent in those countries.

What lessons could both disasters learn from each other?

Cardinal: Preparedness is key. Nepal, Bangladesh and India are no strangers to emergency. They’ve done a lot over the last decade: making sure people evacuate and know where to seek shelter, making sure governments are ready to support the population. We’ve seen that in both [Texas and South Asia.]

Want To Help Hurricane Harvey Victims? Experts Say Donate Cash

Anzalone: And no one agency can do it alone. Aid groups work together to see where they can help.

How do aid groups divvy up the work in times of crisis?

Hassan: In the case of Hurricane Harvey, we are working with the American Red Cross. Everyone knows their responsibilities, so stepping on each other’s toes is not a problem. Right now, our volunteers are assisting in emergency shelters in Dallas, providing support and counseling to the evacuees.

In Bangladesh and India, we’re more independent. We’ve had an office in Bangladesh a long time, we have roots there.

What do people need right now in both places?

Hassan: Right now, cash is king. Material goods aren’t as effective as cold, hard cash. We’ve been stressing all along: whoever wants to donate, please give cash.

In Bangladesh, we’re giving cash cards with about $50 a person to help [flood evacuees] get back on their feet and provide themselves with the essential goods. In Bangladesh, that amount can go a pretty long way.

Is one disaster more urgent than the other?

Anzalone: No one life is greater than the other.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Illinois sues to force police reform in Chicago, accusing Trump administration of dropping the ball

August 30, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

The Illinois attorney general said Tuesday that she has filed a lawsuit to bring about a court-enforceable agreement for police reform in Chicago because the Trump administration proved itself unwilling to press the matter.

Attorney General Lisa Madigan (D) said she would effectively take the place of the Justice Department in trying to negotiate a consent decree — which would include an independent monitor and be subject to a federal judge’s supervision — to force the troubled Chicago Police Department to make changes.

The Justice Department had during the Obama administration investigated the Chicago Police Department and found that officers routinely used excessive force and violated the constitutional rights of residents. But before department lawyers could negotiate a court-enforceable agreement for changes, President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions took office and the usual process was interrupted, Madigan said.

“The new administration at the Department of Justice has made it clear it will no longer seek a consent decree in Chicago,” Madigan said at a news conference to announce the lawsuit. She added later, “We are essentially stepping into the shoes of the Department of Justice, shoes that the DOJ has abandoned at this point.”

The lawsuit relies largely on the Justice Department’s findings and asks a federal judge to intervene.

In a statement, Justice Department spokesman Ian Prior said policing was “first and foremost a matter of local responsibility” and offered a circumspect assessment of Madigan’s lawsuit.

“If the City and State can put in place policies and practices to ensure constitutional, proactive policing that actually serves to reduce Chicago’s rampant violent crime problems, that would be a positive step,” Prior said. “However, we have said repeatedly that we will not agree to or support any measure that will endanger the lives of Chicago’s residents or law enforcement by eroding the rule of law or by failing to properly address violent crime in Chicago. We will continue to work with the city to meet those goals.”

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D), who appeared with Madigan at the news conference and indicated he supported the lawsuit, said that he had been talking with the Trump administration about implementing changes outside of court but that the White House seemed to have abandoned that effort.

“It became clear that they are disinterested in reform, that the Trump administration wasn’t even willing to pursue the concept they proposed themselves,” Emanuel said.

The Obama administration had been aggressive in pursuing court-enforceable reform agreements with police departments across the country, and in its waning days, took steps to put Chicago on the path to one.

The city police department’s troubles are well publicized. On Monday, an officer was convicted of civil rights violations for an incident in which he was caught on video opening fire into a car full of teenagers. The Justice Department had in January issued a blistering 164-page report on the Chicago Police Department as a whole, outlining how officers in the city struggling with gun violence lacked appropriate training and supervision, failed to adequately investigate misconduct and violated residents’ civil rights.

If the administration had not changed hands, the report would have likely put the Chicago department on the path toward a legal agreement that would have mandated reforms. But Sessions, long a critic of such agreements, soon ordered Justice Department officials to review the pacts with troubled police forces nationwide, saying it was necessary to ensure they did not work against the Trump administration’s goals of promoting officer safety and morale while fighting violent crime. His Justice Department tried to delay approval of an agreement in Baltimore, though a judge signed off on it anyway, calling the need for oversight “urgent.” The agreements can be costly and are not always welcomed by officers.

Chicago’s police chief said Tuesday that the department began implementing reforms on its own. The city also had been talking about a solution that would not necessitate court involvement.

But Emanuel said the Trump administration backed off from even that alternative. And Madigan said she felt a court enforceable agreement — which would likely come with deadlines, financial commitments and an independent monitor — was the “only way to achieve real and lasting reform.”

Vanita Gupta, now president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division during the Chicago investigation, said she welcomed Madigan’s suit.

“Everyone deserves a police department that will keep them safe, consistent with the protections our Constitution demands,” Gupta said in a statement. “Where Attorney General Sessions refuses to act, we hope that other state and local governments will follow Illinois’ example and step in to the breach.”

The city of Chicago earlier this month sued the Justice Department in a separate case over the Trump administration’s plan to withhold federal public safety grants to jurisdictions with so-called “sanctuary city” policies. The city has long drawn the president’s attention for its high levels of violence.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS