Christmas gifts that are too racy and lacy: 12m pairs of knickers will NEVER …
December 15, 2011 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
- 24 million pairs of knickers will be given over Christmas – half will never be worn
- 31 per cent of knickers bought by men for their partners are too small
By
Lauren Paxman
Last updated at 4:16 PM on 13th December 2011
A pair of knickers might seem like the perfect last minute present purchase as Christmas Day looms ever closer… but men should choose very carefully.
A national survey has shown that half of the 24 million pairs of knickers given over the festive period will never be worn. They’re too small, too racy, too lacy, or simply the wrong colour.
Twelve million pairs will simply get pushed to the back of the underwear drawer, while a third will get worn just once before being relegated.
So much choice, so little time: Men rarely choose the ‘safe’ option when choosing knickers for their partners
Men are bad at choosing knickers all year round, but they’re at their worst in the run up to Christmas period – the season when they are most likely to impulse buy underwear for their partner.
According to the research commisioned by laundry specialist Dr Beckmann, the worst offenders are men who buy red lacy underwear or other items they consider ‘sexy’.
Male-bought racy underwear is twice as likely as any other kind never to be worn by women.
Women say they will put an astonishing 48 per cent of all knickers, bought for them as Christmas presents, directly into their underwear drawer and will never, ever, wear them.
Of those remaining knickers that are worn, just 20 per cent will be worn more than once before being hidden at the bottom of underwear drawers across the nation.
Some 31 per cent of all Christmas knickers bought by men for their lovers is the wrong size, often too small but sometimes, unforgivably, too big.
Choose carefully: Some 31 per cent of all Christmas knickers bought by men for their lovers is the wrong size, often too small but sometimes, unforgivably, too big
A further 12 per cent are too racy and some 10 per cent are a colour that their lady-love would never wear.
Dr Beckmann spokesman Susan Fermor said: ‘Women love new underwear but it seems that their men often get it wrong when it comes to buying lingerie for their loved ones.
‘This seems especially true at Christmas, when men are most likely to buy their women underwear. Men’s opinion of what their women would like seems to be way off the mark in many, many cases.
‘Britain’s women clearly prefer their own lingerie choices. Like men, many have a few pairs of “favourite” pants, which they prefer to wear on a regular basis.
‘Men rarely play it safe when buying ladies underwear – they seem to go for risque or racy undies which rarely, if ever, get worn.’
Share this article:
Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
-
Newest -
Oldest -
Best rated -
Worst rated
Maybe due to the fact they never get the chance to put them on? And then, back to your comfies.
Report abuse
Unless it caused me physical pain or really didn’t fit I’d wear anything my hubby bought. If any of the boys out there are thinking undies for Christmas I’ll give you a tip. Stay away from anything made of all lace, get some satin or silk in there. As for why, lace is rough, imagine that rubbing up against your tender parts all day you’ll understand.
Report abuse
This clearly shows the major difference between Men and Women.
A man bought something by his Wife/Girlfriend/Both, will wear them to please them. A women will just say she doesn’t like them and never wear them, even if the husband/boyfriend/both would really like to see them wearing it. All’s fair in love and war, not!
Report abuse
To be perfectly honest, this sort of article annoys me greatly. Whatever happened to “the thought that counts”? Now poor men are reading this feeling inadequate at buying gifts unless they get them spot on! I think women should be just grateful their men think of them at all and try to get them something nice!! I will love whatever my man gets me, and my friends too, even a simple card.
Report abuse
Oh no, another overload on E-bay then!!
Report abuse
Well, Guys here is switzerland, you were Red for Good Luck New years eve, so I always get a nice red set for my wife, as long as its red, it get used at least once 
T
Report abuse
My fella said I’ll pretend to buy you knickers as long as you pretend to wear them! Ooh he is awful but I like it!
Report abuse
I got my girl a packet of lingerie (normal stuff not the sexy kind) of them from Bangkok where the shopkeeper said it was free size and would fit any girl.
They ended up being used by my daughter aged 10.
Men don’t have a clue on sizes.
They don’t even know the size of their underwear. Research has shown that Men’s underwear is mostly bought by their women – mothers, wives, girlfriends
Report abuse
A word of advice for all men: never ever choose clothes of any kind for your wife. You’ll get wrong and she won’t like what you buy.
Remember that women have been thinking about clothes and what they look like on since they were toddlers and worried whether the disposable nappy made their bums look fat. No man can catch up with that experience.
I’d advise men to stick to jewllery when they buy a present for their spouses. Usually anything with diamonds is acceptable.
Report abuse
I love the fact that the findings came from a “National Survey”! Who bothers with giving this sort of feedback? And how about telling us what the demographics were that gave the responses!
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Share and Enjoy
Yes it’s true. The perfect American woman today has no pubic hair.
December 15, 2011 by admin
Filed under Choosing Lingerie
According to the Atlantic, American women are in the throes of a revolution. Yes more and more of you are choosing to exist with no pubic hair, with the highest incidence of non pub women in their early 20′s and sexually active.
atlantic: Indiana University researchers Debby Herbenick and Vanessa Schick found in a recent study that nearly 60 percent of American women between 18 and 24 are sometimes or always completely bare down there, while almost half of women in the U.S. between 25 and 29 reported similar habits. Herbenick’s numbers show a clear-cut trend: More women lack pubic hair than ever before.
In case you think this is a risk free or for the risk adverse amongst you, here’s a sampler of what’s in store:
Every four to five weeks, the East Asian Studies major undergoes a cosmetic procedure known as a Brazilian wax. An esthetician pours wax heated to 140° F (roughly the temperature of a steak fresh off the grill) onto her labia and spreads it like butter on bread. Half a minute later, she swiftly peels away the hardened wax — and with it, a full crop of pubic hair, freshly ripped from the follicles.
Which raises the question, what’s inspiring so many women to lay it bare, never mind the discomfort that being bare might cause:
But it’s on the fast track to the endangered species list, and its chief predators include the porn industry, smaller bathing suits and lingerie bottoms, and the Kardashian sisters (case in point: Kim once famously proclaimed that women “shouldn’t have hair anywhere but their heads”).
Kim Kardashian? Well then we ought to know it’s serious right? But before we all go jumping to the local salon one should bear in mind that people have been waxing since the Ancient times. What one should also be aware is that women used to abstain from waxing or shaving not only their pubes, but their armpits and even their legs, not so much because they necessarily found it attractive (which some people do contrary to the beauty mantra out there) but because it created a statement that a woman was not to be cordoned to an ideal Barbie appearance. That this was her way of striking her independence and her right to appear as she willed.
Is it any surprise then that we have come full circle since the heady days of the 70′s where most women experimented with at least hairy armpits?
This of course raises questions of what is acceptable in society, how women are being perceived and represented. Which is to say if women are often being white washed, digitally thinned and manipulated, preened should we really be surprised that so many females are acceding to the view that a perfect woman is a manicured one?
As much as women once found liberation in retaining their pubes they are now also finding liberation and a kind of sexual liberation by donning pubes all together. Being free of pubes has opened women to be free in other arenas, even if it ultimately is just a cosmetic gesture.
But not every woman it seems is a fan of the free hair pub look:
“I’m not a fan of looking like a 12-year-old,” Alanna says. “I think people should have hair down there. Our ancestors grew it for a reason. For protection.”
Apart from the fact that women’s clothes are these days getting skimpier and tighter inspiring some women to seek extra clarity, the notion that women are also getting a complete pub job because of the demands of partners is also questionable:
Drawing back the curtain of pubic hair exposes the clitoris, the labia and the vagina for plain viewing. There’s a tactile element, too: As one elated young husband named Mark explained to Glamour in 2009, “The skin down there is protected — it never really touches anything, it never sees the sun — so it’s ridiculously soft.
“You can’t really tell how soft it is until a woman waxes. Oh my God, you can’t believe how soft it is when you wax,” 28-year-old Mark gushed. “It’s extremely, extremely soft, so it feels great when you have sex.”
But if you want to cut to the chase of what’s inspiring the cropped bare pubes, here’s the simple tell all answer: pornography.
When a team of researchers from George Washington University took a closer look at Playboy’s representations of women’s genitalia throughout the years, they found that in issues dating from the magazine’s inception in 1953 up through the 1970s and ’80s, more than 95 percent of the centerfolds and naked models sported full, apparently natural pubic hair.
In the late 20th century, though, that changed. As Joseph Slade, professor of media and culture at Ohio University, puts it, the media legitimized voyeurism and turned it into a way of life; suddenly, porn viewers wanted to see everything more deeply and without the veil of hair.
And when everyone is being a voyeur on late night tv and the magazine stands it’s not so long before the temptation sets in our own day to day lives to appropriate new cultural cliches.
Slade cites two potential reasons for porn’s fixation on the bare vagina. “It could be attributed to visual pornographers’ desire to infantilize women,” Slade says, “or simply to make genitalia more visible to the camera. Male porn stars often shave their pubic hair for that purpose, too.”
Which raises the question are we adorning the female body or atrophying it to a crude disposition, a kind of temple that allows men and women to express their desires the way one uses a far removed motel for
Pages: 1 2