Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Pray Tell: What The Brooklyn Hasidic Rape Trial Tells Us About Religion …

December 5, 2012 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off


In Brooklyn, a 17-year-old girl just testified against the man accused of sexually assaulting her. On the surface, this case is sadly too familiar: she and her accused rapist are both members of a strict right wing sect of ultra-Orthodox Judaism, known as the Satmar Hasidim.

Extreme groups exist in every religion, and Judaism is no exception. However, the Satmar Hasidim are a fringe group within a fringe group. Though they are ultra-Orthodox Jews (meaning that they keep kosher, observe the Sabbath, and follow all the other rules), they differ from other super-religious Jews in that they don’t support the nation of Israel. Like other ultra-Orthodox Jews (this isn’t really a thing in the more liberal branches of Judaism), they keep strict gender segregation, sending boys and girls to different schools that teach different subjects and keeping men and women separated in synagogue. But the rape case currently happening in Brooklyn could blow the roof of the place.

The 17-year-old girl (I’ll call her “Raish”) at the center of the case, who has not been named, was fairly typical of girls in her community. She was sent to a religious all-girls school and taught about the rules of tznius (modesty), told to wear long skirts and dark stockings while buttoning her sweaters up all the way. One of the men in her community, Nechemya Weberman, was held up as a person of great virtue. Children were sent to him for religious-themed counseling and advice, even though he had no formal training as a therapist or psychologist. And, Raish says, when she went to Weberman he sexually assaulted her.

He kissed and groped her body, she says on the stand, forced her to perform oral sex on him, showed her pornographic films, and made her copy the acts. Sometimes, she says, his children played on the other side of the door, or Weberman’s wife might call before entering to use the very computer on which she said the community pillar forced her to watch and mimic sex. She recounts skipping sessions after Passover in 2009, but said Weberman visited her family home and entered her room while she was in bed and abused her there.

Raish is not the only young woman to challenge the Satmar community lately. Deborah Feldman’s memoir Unorthodox caused a huge scandal, as Feldman alleged she’d been forced into an arranged marriage when she was just 17 (note: Raish is also married, though she says it’s to a man of her choosing). Feldman details the way Satmar girls are raised, eschewing Talmud study in favor of housewifery skills and told that everything in their lives — including their bodies — are the domain of her husband and, by extension, her rabbi. Orthodox couples must follow the laws of niddah, often translated as “family purity,” which means that a woman is considered unclean during while menstruating and for a period afterward. Feldman explained it thusly:

For two weeks every month, he can’t touch you. He can’t hand you a glass, even if your fingers don’t touch. He has to put it down on the table and then you pick it up. Secondary contact can’t happen. If you’re sitting on a sofa, you have a divider between you. It makes you feel so gross. You feel like this animal in the room. If there’s a question about your period, you take the underwear and put it in a zip-lock bag, and give it to your husband. He takes it to the synagogue and pushes it into this special window and the rabbi looks at it and pronounces it kosher or nonkosher. It’s so disgusting.

Unlike Feldman, “Raish” isn’t completely leaving the Satmar world. But the two women – and many others like them – are speaking out against the way that they were raised. Both women grew up in the same Satmar enclave in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, a neighborhood better known for hipsters and “Gossip Girl” characters. (It’s also where I live, and where I’ve had some interesting encounters with Satmar men, as I chronicled on The Frisky before. It seems astonishing that an insular, conservative community can survive just a block away from coffee shops, music venues, and stores that sell lingerie. But Feldman says she was raised to believe that all outsiders were bad people who would kidnap and harm her, so she never went beyond the increasingly narrow confines of her community. But what changed?

The organization Footsteps, who provide support, counseling, and classes for ex-Orthodox Jews, offers some insight into why so many young people are leaving their community. Several have said that access to the internet helped them learn about the outside world and find out that it wasn’t so scary after all. (It’s no coincidence, then, that many Satmar rabbis encourage their communities not to go online and that they held an anti-internet rally in New York earlier this year.) For others, it’s the opportunity to take classes outside at secular schools (Feldman’s was the notoriously liberal Sarah Lawrence College). In Raish’s case, it was a young man she met and interacted with (and kissed, she admitted in court, as if that’s some sort of crime) at a neighborhood coffee shop who showed her that not all non-Satmars are evil.

Often, when we talk about globalization, we talk about fruit from South America being sold in California or workers in Tokyo teleconferencing with their colleagues in London. But one of the effects of globalization is cities that swell and expand, neighborhoods crashing into each other. As the internet becomes more and more accessible, there will be more Raishes. There will be more young men and women who realize that the rest of the world gives them more options for their lives. As the world gets more connected, it will become increasingly difficult for insular communities to remain insular. And the result of that growing connectivity will be women like Raish, who challenge and question the status quo and refuse to back down when crimes are committed.

To their credit, the Satmar community has been supportive of Raish. In the past, communities like theirs have chosen to protect predators rather than let outsiders in. (Just Google “Baruch Lanner” for an example). But in this instance, the Satmar community has chosen to defend one of their daughers rather than protect one of their fathers. And, for this family, that’s a very good thing.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Scottsdale Gun Club Defends Family Photos With Santa And Rifles As Tradition …

December 4, 2012 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

Families who want to pose for photos with Santa while holding on to firearms will once again be able to do so at the Scottsdale Gun Club in Arizona.

“This is our third year doing this at the Scottsdale Gun Club, and every year it continues to grow larger and larger, a lot of folks turning this into a regular holiday tradition,” Ron Kennedy recently told “Fox Friends.”

Kennedy went on to explain that the gun club was looking to “add a little holiday spirit to people’s second amendment rights to be able to carry and purchase firearms.”

According to the club’s website, people are invited to pose with Santa and his machine guns at a starting price of $10.

“Santa’s back with his bag of goodies,” the promotional materials read.

The club already held one day of photo shoots on Nov. 17, and they’ll be holding another on Dec. 2.

In the past, guests have been invited to pose with Santa and a wide range of firearms, including pistols and and modified AR15s.

This isn’t the first time the event has prompted national attention. Last year, the Associated Press described several of the Santa-plus-arms pictures, some of which included young children:

One image shows Santa in a wingback chair with a snowflake background, a Christmas tree behind him and flanked by an $80,000 machine gun and a tripod-mounted rifle. Next to Santa is a man standing behind a boy, who is holding an unloaded AR-15 with an attached grenade launcher.

In another photo, Santa cradles a toddler dressed in camouflage, while a man and woman stand close by with rifles with foldable stocks.

At the time, Democratic state Rep. Steve Farley said the photos were inappropriate.

“To involve machine guns and Santa in a celebration in the birth of Jesus Christ is the worst kind of heresy I can imagine,” Farley told the AP. “I would suggest that the people who created this read some of the New Testament.”

When asked by “Fox Friends” about about Farley’s objections and, specifically, the Tucson shooting that wounded U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and 12 others, the club’s manager responded by saying that people don’t have to participate in the event if they don’t want to. He also stressed the safety precautions that the club takes during the photo shoots, such as removing the firing pins and not allowing people to place their fingers on the triggers.

As Mediaite noted, the Scottsdale Gun Club has been the site of three self-inflicted shootings since 2007. Two of those shootings were considered suicides, and the third was accidental, according to the Arizona Republic.

(h/t The Raw Story for the find.)

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow

  • 1981: The Attempted Assassination Of President Ronald Reagan

    on March 30, 1981, President Reagan and three others were shot and wounded in an assassination attempt by John Hinckley, Jr. outside the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C. Reagan’s press secretary, Jim Brady, was shot in the head.

  • 1993: The Brady Handgun Violence Act

    The Brady Handgun Violence Act of 1993, signed into law by President Bill Clinton, mandated that federally licensed dealers complete comprehensive background checks on individuals before selling them a gun. The legislation was named for James Brady, who was shot during an attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan in 1981.

  • 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act

    The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1994, instituted a ban on 19 kinds of assault weapons, including Uzis and AK-47s. The crime bill also banned the possession of magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. (An exemption was made for weapons and magazines manufactured prior to the ban.)

  • 2004: Law Banning Magazines Holding More Than Ten Rounds Of Ammunition Expires

    In 2004, ten years after it first became law, Congress allowed a provision banning possession of magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition to expire through a sunset provision. Brady Campaign President Paul Helmke told HuffPost that the expiration of this provision meant that Rep. Gabby Giffords’s alleged shooter was able to fire off 20-plus shots without reloading (under the former law he would have had only ten).

  • 2007: The U.S. Court of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Rules In Favor Of Dick Heller

    In 2007 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled to allow Dick Heller, a licensed District police officer, to keep a handgun in his home in Washington, D.C. Following that ruling, the defendants petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

  • 2008: The NICS Improvement Amendments Act

    Following the deadly shooting at Virginia Tech University, Congress passed legislation to require states provide data on mentally unsound individuals to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, with the aim of halting gun purchases by the mentally ill, and others prohibited from possessing firearms. The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush in January of 2008.

  • 2008: Supreme Court Strikes Down D.C. Handgun Ban As Unconstitutional

    In June of 2008, the United States Supreme Court upheld the verdict of a lower court ruling the D.C. handgun ban unconstitutional in the landmark case emDistrict of Columbia v. Heller/em.

  • Gabrielle Giffords And Trayvon Martin Shootings

    Gun control advocates had high hopes that reform efforts would have increased momentum in the wake of two tragic events that rocked the nation.

    In January of 2011, Jared Loughner opened fire at an event held by Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), killing six and injuring 13, including the congresswoman. Resulting attempts to push gun control legislation a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/09/trayvon-martin-shooting-gun-debate_n_1413115.html” target=”_hplink”proved fruitless/a, with neither proposal even succeeding in gaining a single GOP co-sponsor.

    More than a year after that shooting, Florida teenager Trayvon Martin was a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/trayvon-martin” target=”_hplink”gunned down/a by George Zimmerman in an event that some believed would bring increased scrutiny on the nation’s Stand Your Ground laws. While there has been increasing discussion over the nature of those statutes, lawmakers were a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/09/trayvon-martin-shooting-gun-debate_n_1413115.html” target=”_hplink”quick to concede/a that they had little faith the event would effectively spur gun control legislation, thanks largely to the National Rifle Association’s vast lobbying power.

    Read more a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/09/trayvon-martin-shooting-gun-debate_n_1413115.html” target=”_hplink”here/a:

  • Colorado Movie Theater Shooting

    In July of 2012, a heavily armed gunman a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/20/aurora-shooting-movie-theater-batman_n_1688547.html” target=”_hplink”opened fire on theatergoers/a attending a midnight premiere of the final film of the latest Batman trilogy, killing 12 and wounding scores more.

    The suspect, James Eagan Holmes, allegedly carried out the act with a number of handguns, as well as an AR-15 assault rifle with a 100-round drum magazine.

    Some lawmakers used the incident, which took place in a state with some of the laxest gun control laws, to bring forth legislation designed to place increased regulations on access to such weapons, but many observers, citing previous experience, were a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/20/batman-shooting_n_1690547.html” target=”_hplink”hesitant to say/a that they would be able to overcome the power of the National Rifle Association and Washington gun lobby.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS