Wednesday, June 17, 2026

‘Canary in the coal mine’: Republicans fear Democratic wins mean more losses to come

November 9, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

A wave of Democratic victories ignited a ferocious debate across the Republican Party on Wednesday over whether President Trump’s un­or­tho­dox behavior and polarizing agenda are jeopardizing the GOP’s firm grip on power in Congress, governors’ mansions and state legislatures.

The recriminations sparked by Tuesday’s results — a decisive rebuke of Trump and his policies in Virginia and elsewhere — threatened the fragile GOP push to pass sweeping tax cuts by the end of the year and raised deeper questions about Republican identity and fealty to a historically unpopular president.

A year ahead of the 2018 midterm elections, Republicans are increasingly uncertain about keeping their majorities on Capitol Hill and are worried about how damaging Trump’s jagged brand of politics may become to the party.

“Donald Trump is an anchor for the GOP,” said veteran party strategist Mike Murphy, a Trump critic. “We got that message in loud volume in Virginia. The ­canary in the coal mine didn’t just pass out; its head exploded.”

The unease was palpable among vulnerable lawmakers, especially in suburban districts with the kind of voters who roundly rejected Ed Gillespie in Virginia. The Republican gubernatorial nominee ran on countering gang crime and illegal immigration and protecting Confederate history — cultural issues that Trump has made a touchstone of his presidency — but lost to ­Democrat Ralph Northam, 54 percent to 45 percent.

“Establishment Republicans are blaming Trump and talking about Armageddon, but what is their alternative?” one Republican strategist asked. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) said Tuesday’s contests were a lesson to Republicans that catering to the party’s conservative base with hard-line appeals and incendiary language turns off the moderate voters they need to win in states like his own. He said his party must choose between a political message of “blaming and scapegoating” or a more hopeful pitch centered around everyday issues such as health care and the economy.

“This is a repudiation of the politics of narrow,” Kasich said. In an apparent reference to Trump’s 2016 victory, the governor added, “The politics of anger may work for a moment in time, but it does not last, thank goodness.”

But other party leaders warned against drawing overly broad conclusions about Trump and his political strength from defeats in a handful of states — including two, Virginia and New Jersey, that Democrat Hillary Clinton won in last year’s presidential election.

“Democrats say this is a repudiation and this is an anti-Trump vote, but to me the case doesn’t stick,” said Robin Hayes, chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party. “Donald Trump is extremely popular in a lot of places. His promise to ‘drain the swamp’ resonated and still does.”

Said Gov. Bill Haslam (R-Tenn.): “When you see one night of elections, you see one night of elections. There is always natural wind at your back if you’re not in the White House, and wind in your face if you are.”

Still, even among Trump’s allies, there were complaints about the White House being dis­engaged and unready to deal with the party’s mounting challenges.

Gov. John Kasich (R-Ohio) called Tuesday’s results “a repudiation of the politics of narrow.” (Ron Schwane/AP)

“The White House isn’t paying attention to the suburbs, and there has never really been a political operation there,” said Edward J. Rollins, the strategist for the Great America Alliance super PAC, a pro-Trump group. “They have to develop a strategy where it’s not just Trump alone winning, where the whole party is able to win.”

Andy Surabian, an adviser to the group and an associate of former White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon, said blame cast upon Trump and Bannon for lurching the GOP to the right was misplaced.

“Establishment Republicans are blaming Trump and talking about Armageddon, but what is their alternative?” Surabian asked.

White House officials defended Trump’s efforts to help fellow Republicans, noting that he has held numerous fundraisers and other events to help the party. And they argued that the best way for incumbents to navigate the political turbulence would be enacting tax cuts and other Trump policies.

“The American people expect Republican majorities to deliver on their promises of boosting our economy, cutting taxes and repealing the disastrous Obamacare law,” said Raj Shah, a White House spokesman. “Nothing would help the political standing of Republicans in Congress more than delivering on the president’s agenda.”

Trump’s friends at the Capitol said the divisions are more about style than substance. “The difficulty is, we have a president who didn’t come from the Washington structure, so it’s really hard for people inside the structure or outside the structure to evaluate him,” Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) said.

The fresh discord comes after weeks of escalating tensions inside the GOP. Three prominent Republican senators — John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona and Bob Corker of Tennessee — have publicly condemned Trump’s leadership and questioned his fitness for office.

It also comes amid an exodus of House Republicans. This week alone, Reps. Frank A. LoBiondo (N.J.) and Ted Poe (Texas) announced they would not seek reelection next year, joining a list of more than two dozen colleagues who are retiring or running for a different office. Democrats see many of those vacancies as ripe territory as they look to win back the House majority. Democrats will need to capture 24 additional seats next year to reach the 218-seat threshold to control the House.

Rep. Ryan Costello (R-Pa.) conceded that the election results present challenges for incumbents like him. He represents a suburban Philadelphia district that Democrats are targeting aggressively in a region where Democrats won some local and county races for the first time in more than a century.

“We don’t know if it’ll be a wave. What we saw yesterday suggests that hypothesis has some merit, but remember, congressional districts are still one by one,” Costello told reporters on Capitol Hill. “I’m very confident that I’ve given 110 percent effort to this job.”

Democrats are grappling with problems of their own. As celebratory and cathartic as Tuesday’s victories were for a party demoralized by Trump’s victory, Democratic leaders know Northam’s success in Virginia does not necessarily mean there will be a nationwide upswing next November.

“Virginia is a microcosm of a large portion of the nation, but it doesn’t represent every community or every state,” said Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.). “We have to make sure that we are fighting for the people where they’re at — in the rural and urban communities — and reflect their struggle to have better lives.”

Ruiz added, “Running purely against Trump is not the full picture.”

Democratic leaders have echoed that sentiment, saying the party must develop its own affirmative message and must strive to connect with voters everywhere, in particular regions where Trump remains popular.

“There remains a lot of work to do in reaching those small-town or rural Democratic voters,” Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. (D-Pa.) said. “They are the ones who need to hear from us, too. Those are the voters our party has had a problem with over the years. We need to speak to them about the lack of wage growth and the opioid crisis. We may not even win in those areas, but we could narrow the margins.”

Republican strategists said the party’s image has suffered from nearly a year of stalemates, fits and failures to govern, despite the party’s control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. That is one reason the proposed tax code overhaul has taken on such urgency among GOP leaders.

Robert J. Dole, a former Republican Senate leader and presidential nominee, said that it was premature to assess the political environment for the midterms and that his party could improve its standing if it manages to pass major legislation.

“While I am disappointed in the overall results of yesterday’s election in Virginia, I don’t believe we can measure the full impact on the GOP just yet,” Dole said. “If Congress passes the tax bill this year, this will help the president’s popularity. As a party, we should have a better sense of where things are headed in six months or so.”

Republican consultant Josh Holmes, a former chief of staff to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), said Tuesday’s losses should prompt the party’s lawmakers to act quickly on taxes.

“It provides all the motivation they need to get something done,” Holmes said. “In part, what happened on Tuesday is a reaction to what’s not being done and a warning sign that they need to move. They don’t have any choice but to do the tax plan.”

But with aspects of the tax plan fluid as Republicans squabble over its details, Murphy and other Republicans said lawmakers will have to make decisions that allow them to appear independent from Trump in case the tax legislation fails to pass or the president’s approval ratings decline further.

“Republican members of Congress in swing districts cannot be Trump lemmings. They have to create their own strong identities,” Murphy said.

In the states where Republicans have won control of a majority of gubernatorial offices and state legislatures over the last decade, GOP leaders said the path forward was much the same: protect yourself.

“People get in trouble when they try to wear someone else’s clothes,” Haslam said. “Each candidate has to decide for himself or herself whether [Trump] is something to focus on or if they’re running for governor of their state and saying, ‘I’m going to run my race.’ Good candidates rise or fall on their own.”

Ed O’Keefe contributed to this report.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Justice Department Says Not So Fast to AT&T’s Time Warner Bid

November 9, 2017 by  
Filed under Choosing Lingerie

Comments Off

In one account of the meeting, Justice Department officials called on ATT to sell Turner Broadcasting — the group of cable channels under the Time Warner banner that includes CNN — as a potential requirement for gaining government approval, according to three people from the companies involved, who spoke on the condition that they not be named because of the delicacy of the negotiations.

Or, the people said, ATT could sell off DirecTV, the satellite television provider that it bought two years ago for nearly $49 billion. But ATT and Time Warner executives say privately that such a concession is not realistic, given that DirecTV and its DirecTV Now streaming service would be crucial to a combined ATT-Time Warner.

A different account emerged later: It was Mr. Stephenson who had offered to sell off CNN as part of a strategy to win governmental approval, according to two Justice Department officials who declined to speak publicly about the meeting. The officials also insisted that selling the cable news channel would not be enough to address antitrust concerns.

Mr. Stephenson responded with a public denial. “Until now, we’ve never commented on our discussions with the D.O.J.,” Mr. Stephenson said. “But given D.O.J.’s statement this afternoon, it’s important to set the record straight. Throughout this process, I have never offered to sell CNN and have no intention of doing so.”

The Justice Department said it was committed to carrying out its duties in accordance with the laws and the facts. “Beyond that, the department does not comment on any pending investigation,” it said in a statement.

ATT and Time Warner are poised to fight to keep all their assets intact, believing that the government has no legal grounds for blocking the transaction, according to the company officials.

At stake is a deal that, if completed, would join one of the nation’s biggest wireless internet providers to HBO, CNN, Warner Bros. and DirecTV. Behind it is the desire to create a powerful provider and distributor of content, with ATT able to both produce hits like “Game of Thrones” and distribute them to wireless service customers and DirecTV subscribers.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

The deal is designed to help ATT counter slowing growth in its core wireless, internet and satellite businesses while fending off online video upstarts like Netflix and Hulu.

Because the proposed deal involves two companies that do not compete directly with each other, executives at both ATT and Time Warner believe there is little legal basis to block it.

Mr. Trump, who has long accused CNN of being biased against him, has spoken against the proposed deal — most notably during a speech in the final month of the 2016 presidential campaign, in Gettysburg, Pa.

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

After mentioning the “crooked” media, he seemed to oppose ATT’s bid for Time Warner on populist grounds. “As an example of the power structure I’m fighting,” Mr. Trump said, “ATT is buying Time Warner and thus CNN, a deal we will not approve in my administration, because it’s too much concentration of power in the hands of too few.”

In response to news articles speculating that the president had pressured the Justice Department concerning the proposed deal, White House Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah said, “The President did not speak with the Attorney General about this matter, and no White House official was authorized to speak with the Department of Justice on this matter.”

Mr. Delrahim, the assistant attorney general, also denied that Mr. Trump had been involved in the discussions.

“I have never been instructed by the White House on this or any other transaction under review by the antitrust division,” he said.

Critics of the merger have described it as a sign that there is too much consolidation in the media and telecommunications industries. Even lawmakers who have otherwise been critical of Mr. Trump have offered support for the Justice Department’s continued review.

Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, said on Twitter that the deal still needed a “thorough” and “exacting” review.

The uncertainty has weighed on Time Warner’s stock, as investors have worried that the deal may founder on antitrust grounds. Those fears began to crystallize on Wednesday, when ATT’s chief financial officer, John Stephens, said at an investor conference that the timing of the deal’s closing was in doubt.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

“We are in active discussions with the D.O.J.,” Mr. Stephens said. “I cannot comment on those discussions. But with those discussions, I can now say that the timing of the closing of the deal is now uncertain.”

To win approval of the deal, ATT early on hired lobbyists close to Vice President Mike Pence and others in the Trump administration. ATT was among the top donors to Mr. Trump’s inauguration.

Mr. Stephenson, the ATT chief, has attended at least two meetings with Mr. Trump this year. Shortly after the first one, Mr. Trump lashed out at CNN on Twitter, saying that “their credibility will soon be gone!” After the second meeting, the president complimented Mr. Stephenson, saying he was doing “really a top job.”

Fighting the deal could prove challenging for regulators, antitrust experts said. The Justice Department would have to argue that ATT would have an incentive to withhold Turner channels from rival broadband distributors like Verizon and Comcast. It could also try to demonstrate that ATT would give channels like CNN or TNT preferential treatment over their competitors.

A potential requirement to sell DirecTV is rooted in the idea that ATT would otherwise have too much control over the distribution of content. The company could block competing networks like Starz or ESPN from running on DirecTV’s satellite or streaming services, the argument goes.

A counterargument to that line of thinking is the Obama administration’s approval of Comcast’s acquisition of NBC Universal in 2011. In that case, the Justice Department and Federal Communications Commission attached several conditions to Comcast’s business practices, including promises that Comcast would not withhold content from rival streaming services.

Mr. Trump, however, was also critical of the Comcast-NBC deal in his Gettysburg speech last year.

Brooks Barnes, Maggie Haberman, John Koblin and Charlie Savage contributed reporting.


Continue reading the main story

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS