Sunday, July 26, 2026

Columbia business provides feathers to famous

May 28, 2014 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) — The phone rings. It’s Beyoncé’s manager, asking for 80 white ostrich feather fans for the singer’s upcoming tour.

On the other end, Abby Arauz catches her breath and looks at the calendar. She has just 10 days to put together the elaborate showpieces.

But her team of 20 will make it happen. They will work long hours gathering the feathers, washing and dyeing them, and sewing them together with dental floss. They will, through sheer determination, meet the deadline.

In the past few years, Arauz has fielded dozens of similar requests — masks for Mardi Gras, headdresses for Carnival in Brazil, feathers for the costumes in “The Hunger Games,” thousands of wings for Victoria’s Secret holiday displays, The Columbia Missourian reported (http://bit.ly/1jUNA8T ) .

Arauz and her family own The Feather Place, a far-flung operation with an office in Columbia, showrooms in New York City and Los Angeles, and a wholesale business in California, Mo., called Zucker Feather Products.

A former Rockette at Radio City Music Hall, Arauz opened her first showroom in New York in 1998, added another in Los Angeles eight years later and moved to Columbia four years ago to run the venture while raising two children.

She is the third generation of her family in the business, founded by her grandparents in the 1960s as an outlet selling feathers to fly fishermen. Her parents added the wholesale business in the 1980s, and Arauz has taken it to the entertainment industry and beyond.

As a leading U.S. supplier of wholesale feathers, Zucker Feather Products sells to a variety of businesses, including big-name retailers such as Hobby Lobby and the Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft stores.

The Feather Place is the retail side, assembling ostrich plumes, peacock “eyes” and a variety of bird feathers into fans, headpieces, lingerie, jewelry, masks, holiday feather trees, wreaths and more.

To market the business, Arauz collaborates with Broadway producers, fashion designers, pop stars, big chain craft stores and others who need feathers for costumes, retail displays and high-end couture.

“We keep thinking of new ideas that you can do with feathers,” she said. “I think it’s our responsibility in the industry to keep providing new uses.”

Every year, she works with Victoria’s Secret to create the wings models wear for the company’s annual fashion show.

Last year, Arauz’s crew used ostrich plumes, pheasant and peacock feathers, and long, droopy rooster tails to create the elaborate wings on the backs of angels during the fashion show. Her company also makes the extravagant holiday displays seen in outlets worldwide.

For “The Hunger Games” movies, costume designers visited the Feather Place showroom in Los Angeles to find feathers for costumes. According to the New York Times, feathers and flames were used in clothing for Katniss, the heroine, “to keep her the Girl on Fire while also representing the Mockingjay.”

To see how the feathers are stored and dyed requires a drive on Highway 50 to California, Mo., about an hour southwest of Columbia. If you head down the main street, with its red-brick store fronts, restaurants and corner gas station, you’ll reach the Old Heck Saddlery Building on the outskirts of town.

From 1978 to 2004, the old saddlery building held the entire operation. Ten years ago, another building was added 5 miles away, and the old place became the dye shop, where feathers are cleaned, bleached, dyed and dried. The new building became the location where feather products are assembled.

Most of the business’ 65 employees work in either the dye shop or the factory in California, Mo., with the remainder in the New York and Los Angeles showrooms. Many have been with the feather company for more than 20 years.

All of the feathers are by-products of industries that would have otherwise discarded them. Most are from farms across the nation, with the exotic ones imported from other countries, including the ostrich feathers from South Africa.

Turkey feathers are the most common staple of the company. The feathers are stored in one room of the old saddlery building in large canvas bags. From there, they are hauled downstairs to be washed and bleached, a process that takes about a week.

The dye station sits next to the washing and bleaching station. All of the color samples are kept in a box with a binder that holds the recipes for different shades. An employee will match a recipe with the exact color requested by the client.

Once the perfect match has been made, the feathers are dyed, typically in bright primary colors, then taken upstairs to be washed again. Finally, they are placed on shelves or hung on clotheslines to dry.

When the process is complete, the feathers are driven to the factory 5 miles down the road. There, sewing machines are used to assemble the variety of feather crafts the company offers.

Arauz’s grandfather started the company in the 1960s to serve the fly fishing industry.

“They were dyeing feathers out of the basement in their washer and dryer,” Arauz said.

Her grandparents traveled around the country for years, selling them out of the back of a van. From a young age, Arauz tagged along in the summer and learned all about the business.

In the 1980s, her father purchased Zucker Feather Products, a wholesale feather business that allowed the company to integrate the operation from feather to finished product. Now, Arauz and her brother, Anthony, run the company, along with their parents. Anthony is the CEO.

“I enjoy traveling to meet suppliers and customers in all parts of the world,” he said in an interview.

Abby Arauz said the family aspect is important to her.

“It’s all about having a team; that’s for sure,” she said. “I have really dedicated people who are enthusiastic about their work.”

Diane Puig is one of those people. She began working for the company nine years ago in the New York City showroom. Now, she focuses on customer service, sales and information in the factory in California, Mo.

“I really love it here,” she said. “I get up every morning and don’t mind coming to work.”

In college, Arauz was a dance and accounting major. After graduating from Stephens, she moved to New York City and toured with national theater productions, including “Singing in the Rain.”

When she became a Rockette, she spent 10 years touring and performing in the Radio City Christmas Spectacular. During that decade, she began consulting with costume designers and realized she had the knowledge to purchase feathers at competitive prices.

While still a Rockette, she opened The Feather Place in New York City. With just one subway stop between her two jobs, she started to cater to Broadway shows and fashion houses.

When her career as a Rockette ended, Arauz teamed up film designers and opened another showroom in Los Angeles in 2006.

Four years ago, she became pregnant with her second child, which prompted her and her husband to make a change.

“I loved growing up in Missouri myself,” she said, “so we decided to move back to Columbia.”

Arauz lives in town with her husband, Jack Chase, and their children, Sophia and Gus. Three days a week, she commutes to California, Mo., to oversee the factory operation.

She opened The Feather Place on West Broadway six months ago as office space; Arauz calls it “a feather think tank.” She and one employee work together to create do-it-yourself projects and to work with schools on crafts and events.

Recently, they supplied feathers for the Lee Expressive Arts Elementary School’s production of “Seussical the Musical.”

“I deal with large-name designers on Big Bird’s feathers, as well as for little crafters,” she said. “There’s something for everyone.”

Her biggest challenge is moving quickly enough to keep up with the latest trends, she said. But Arauz is also pleased that her business has deep family roots.

“Looking back, it makes me kind of proud to continue the business that my grandparents started,” she said.

___

Information from: Columbia Missourian, http://www.columbiamissourian.com

An AP Member Exchange from The Columbia Missourian

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Why Mick Jagger’s biographer thinks the Rolling Stones singer is now the …

May 28, 2014 by  
Filed under Lingerie Events

Comments Off

By
Christopher Sandford

19:51 EST, 27 May 2014


|

02:48 EST, 28 May 2014

Mick Jagger (left) and Keith Richards (right) from the Rolling Stones perform on the Pyramid Stage during Glastonbury 2013

Mick Jagger (left) and Keith Richards (right) from the Rolling Stones perform on the Pyramid Stage during Glastonbury 2013

Mick Jagger wore a silk paisley shirt and sequined jacket. Ronnie Wood a red leather jacket and  skin-tight black trousers.

Keith Richards’s shock of white hair was held back by a blue silk bandana to match his blue bomber jacket.

As the Rolling Stones lurched on stage on Monday night in Oslo, fans nervously held their breath waiting to see if Richards would remember the first chords of the band’s opening number Jumpin’ Jack Flash.

They had reason to be anxious. Last July, at a concert in London’s Hyde Park, he had made a bit of a hash of it.

As the stage lights went up, many in the 65,000-strong crowd sang along lustily to the band’s opening number Start Me Up.

Unfortunately, in all the excitement, the legendary ‘Human Riff’, as he’s known, appeared to suffer a brief but catastrophic technical meltdown, and delivered a  series of notes that belonged to another song altogether.

One of the few people present that night seemingly unfamiliar with the famous three-note intro to Start Me Up was the man who actually wrote it.

Of course, the Stones have always had a sort of ramshackle charm, and no one expects them to be over-rehearsed.

But to paraphrase Oscar Wilde: to mangle the opening number of one concert might be regarded as a misfortune; to do exactly the same thing again a week later, as Keith then did, begins to look like carelessness.

We all marvel at the Stones’ longevity. After 52 years together, they remain an extraordinary example of endurance in an industry that tends to throw its performers on the scrap heap in early middle age.

For many of us, who grew up listening to the Stones, there’s still a vicarious buzz in seeing the old codgers behaving badly.

Trailblazers: A 1969 photo of The Rolling Stones members (left to right) Bill Wyman, Charlie Watts, Mick Jagger, Mick Taylor and Keith Richards before their concert at Hyde Park

Trailblazers: A 1969 photo of The Rolling Stones members (left to right) Bill Wyman, Charlie Watts, Mick Jagger, Mick Taylor and Keith Richards before their concert at Hyde Park

We want to be entertained by stories about them swaggering around crashing their cars and allegedly snorting the ashes of their late fathers.

It’s not just that the Stones refuse to grow up: they seem actually to live in a teenage time warp. What a sad lot most of today’s bands are by comparison.

In an era when most modern pop stars dress as if they work at Tesco and lecture us about climate change, the Stones are still out there in their skimpy T-shirts and leather trousers, chasing lingerie-clad teenagers.

Jagger performs during a concert in the Telenor Arena at Fornebu in Baerum just south of Oslo, Norway, on Monday

Jagger performs during a concert in the Telenor Arena at Fornebu in Baerum just south of Oslo, Norway, on Monday

They are Britain’s favourite reprobates, for whom morality is pretty much whatever they want it to be.

But putting aside nostalgia for the Stones in their heyday, are they actually that good any more? Or could it be time for these septuagenarians to do the dignified thing and retire?

It’s not just that the Stones themselves are obviously older – at 70, Mick Jagger recently became a great-grandfather – but that their shows increasingly seem to resemble a Las Vegas revue.

There are lashings of fireworks and other effects, dozens of props for Mick to play with, scores of costume changes, and more than twice as many back-up musicians as there are actual band members on stage.

As I know from my experience as Mick Jagger’s biographer, it’s all a long way from their roots in smoke-filled rooms like the Ealing Jazz Club.

Improvisation and spontaneity have been lost entirely. When Keith recently launched into an apparently impromptu number at an arena in California, a crew of backstage technicians had to frantically reload the lighting program to accompany him.

Strip away the mystique and the critical goodwill that surround the Stones, and you’re left with some oddly clumsy versions of their classic songs.

Compared with its sleek studio version, Honky Tonk Women nowadays lumbers badly – one critic compared it to a heavy-goods lorry, as opposed to the original Ferrari – while the likes of Brown Sugar have been dumbed-down into a metallic din with a few shouted variants of the chorus.

Mick Jagger may be a glorious one-man rebellion against the march of time, but even he isn’t the performer he once was.

Nowadays Jagger’s default move on stage is to pace from one wing to another, often while flicking his fingers irritably from side to side, as if attempting to dry them in a public lavatory without a towel. He has become the Albert Steptoe of rock ‘n’ roll.

It takes a certain suspension of disbelief to watch a band led by a knight of the realm and composed of four cricket-loving millionaires as they plough their way through Street Fighting Man or Sympathy For The Devil.

Even the most devoted fans, however, have questioned Jagger's decision to embark on yet another European tour this week, just over two months after L'Wren Scott's apparent suicide

Even the most devoted fans, however, have questioned Jagger’s decision to embark on yet another European tour this week, just over two months after L’Wren Scott’s apparent suicide

Perhaps what we’re really applauding is what the Stones once represented – youth, rebellion, freedom – rather than the pristine quality of the music. During their last performance at the O2 Arena in London, Keith received a standing ovation merely for lighting up a cigarette.

In recent years, the Stones have been plagued by a bewildering variety of problems – many of them typical of men of pensionable age. Richards fell off a ladder in his library, cracking several ribs in the process.

Mick Jagger had to pull out of one concert because of laryngitis. More shows were cancelled when Keith hit his head on a tree trunk when he fell on a beach in Fiji, and subsequently underwent life-saving brain surgery.

Then, a blow from which many thought the Stones couldn’t possibly recover. In March, they cancelled seven concerts in Australia and New Zealand after the tragic death of Jagger’s long-time partner L’Wren Scott.

Many thought this would finally persuade Mick Jagger to hang up his skinny jeans. But the one constant factor through the decades has been Sir Mick’s single-minded determination to keep the show on the road.

Mick Jagger, then 25, and actress Marianne Faithfull, 22, leaving a house in Chelsea, London

Mick Jagger, then 25, and actress Marianne Faithfull, 22, leaving a house in Chelsea, London

In his 70s, he has become almost Churchillian in his defiance of whatever obstacles cross his path. In November 2006, Jagger put on a brave face when performing in front of a sold-out crowd in Las Vegas just hours after his beloved father Joe had died in London, aged 93.

During the same tour, the Stones went on stage in New York moments after their long-time friend and former record company president Ahmet Ertegun, 83, had slipped and hit his head in their backstage hospitality suite.

in July 1969, the Stones famously went on stage in front of 300,000 people in Hyde Park, just two days after their founding member Brian Jones had drowned in his swimming pool

in July 1969, the Stones famously went on stage in front of 300,000 people in Hyde Park, just two days after their founding member Brian Jones had drowned in his swimming pool

Ertegun fell into a coma and died without regaining consciousness six weeks later. Even the most devoted fans, however, have questioned Jagger’s decision to embark on yet another European tour this week, just over two months after L’Wren Scott’s apparent suicide.

Will nothing, no tragedy, no physical setback, persuade Jagger to leave the stage? Perhaps it is just Mick’s way of coping.

Back in July 1969, the Stones famously went on stage in front of 300,000 people in Hyde Park, just two days after their founding member Brian Jones had drowned in his swimming pool.

Thirty-six hours later, in Sydney to make a film, Jagger’s girlfriend Marianne Faithfull took a nearly-fatal overdose of sleeping pills. He helped to save her life.

Mick then wandered off by himself with a guitar and wrote the classic Stones rave-up Brown Sugar, before giving orders for the band to prepare to tour America.

At a concert at Altamont in northern California later that year, where Hells Angels had been hired as bodyguards, a young fan, Meredith Hunter, was stabbed to death.

The Stones were aware that there had been a scuffle, but weren’t told of its tragic consequence until later. They played on. They always do. Many of the Stones’ fans will be cheering this week, happy to see this rock ‘n’ roll institution back on stage.

Going to their concerts has become increasingly like visiting an ancient stately home, impressive for what it represents, whatever its present state of ruin.

Others fear that the Stones are now beginning to look like Elvis Presley in his last days – still more-or-less intact, but tottering on the brink of something really embarrassing.

  • Christopher Sandford’s The Rolling Stones: Fifty Years (Simon Schuster) is available now.


Comments (1)

Share what you think

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

HubbaBuba,

Toronto, Canada,

5 hours ago

I saw them and traveled a great distance in summer 1986. THAT tour add (and impetous for traveling) was the “Last Rolling Stones Tour” to see them. 28 years of lies since. I wouldn’t see them no matter what. Respect? LOOOOOOOOOONG gone.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Who is this week’s top commenter?
Find out now

Share and Enjoy